Phone: 312-714-2800
August 2025 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 -
Recent Posts
- How the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” Targets Immigrant Health, Families, and DACA Recipients August 3, 2025
- Biden, the Border, and the Facts: David J. Bier’s In-Depth Analysis of America’s Migration Surge August 3, 2025
- BIA Narrows Path for Relief: Arizona’s Meth Laws & the Realistic Probability Test in Immigration Cases July 30, 2025
- Denaturalization Under the Trump Administration: Legal Standards, Constitutional Constraints, and DOJ Enforcement Priorities July 2, 2025
- Administrative Closure Explained: When Detention Means No Pause June 7, 2025
Archives
Categories
RSS Feed
Links
- CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD)
- Law Offices of Michael D. Baker
-
Category Archives: Cancellation of Removal
Matter of Gilton Bain: When Criminal History Outweighs Family Ties in U.S. Immigration Law: Rules for Cancellation of Removal and the Role of Rehabilitation
Matter of Gilton Bain: When Criminal History Outweighs Family Ties in U.S. Immigration Law The Matter of Gilton Bain is a significant and recently designated precedent in immigration law. The Board of Immigration Appeals issued its decision on February 6, … Continue reading
SCOTUS Pereira v. Sessions: A Notice to Appear that does not include the specific time and place of the non LPRs removal proceedings does not trigger the stop-time rule under §1229(a) of the INA.
The Pereira decision is significant to many non-citizens who received notices like Pereira’s. The clock continued to run on their physical presence in the U.S. after they received notices without dates, which will potentially enable them to qualify for relief … Continue reading
CA7 granted Mexican national’s motion to stay his removal pending appeal as trial counsel failed to adequately prepare him for removal proceeding
CA7 granted alien-citizen of Mexico’s motion to stay his removal pending appeal, where alien alleged that Bd. had erred in failing to grant his motion to reopen removal proceeding based on allegations that his trial counsel had failed to adequately … Continue reading
CA7 upholds denial of cancellation of removal as continuous residency stopped at conviction
Isunza came to the U.S. from Mexico at age 17 in 1978. His parents were lawfully present in the U.S., but Isunza became a permanent resident through the sponsorship of his wife in 1994. In 1998, he was found guilty … Continue reading
Cancellation of Removal for Non-Lawful Permanent Residents under INA Section 240A(b)(1)
Statutory Eligibility. To be eligible for cancellation of removal under INA § 240A(b), the applicant must establish that s/he (1) has been physically present in the United States for a continuous period of not less than 10 years immediately preceding … Continue reading
Posted in Cancellation of Removal, Cancellation Of Removal and The Stop-Time Rule, Cancellation of Removal for Non LPRS under INA Section 240A(b)(1), Cancellation of Removal for Non-Lawful Permanent Residents, Non-LPR cancellation, Uncategorized, Voluntary Departure At Conclusion of Proceedings
Comments Off on Cancellation of Removal for Non-Lawful Permanent Residents under INA Section 240A(b)(1)