-
Afrikaans
Shqip
አማርኛ
العربية
Հայերեն
Azərbaycan dili
Euskara
Беларуская мова
বাংলা
Bosanski
Български
Català
Cebuano
Chichewa
简体中文
繁體中文
Corsu
Hrvatski
Čeština
Dansk
Nederlands
English
Esperanto
Eesti
Filipino
Suomi
Français
Frysk
Galego
ქართული
Deutsch
Greek
ગુજરાતી
Kreyol ayisyen
Harshen Hausa
Ōlelo Hawaiʻi
עִבְרִית
हिन्दी
Hmong
Magyar
Íslenska
Igbo
Bahasa Indonesia
Gaelige
Italiano
日本語
Basa Jawa
ಕನ್ನಡ
Қазақ тілі
ភាសាខ្មែរ
한국어
كوردی
Кыргызча
ພາສາລາວ
Latin
Latviešu valoda
Lietuvių kalba
Lëtzebuergesch
Македонски јазик
Malagasy
Bahasa Melayu
മലയാളം
Maltese
Te Reo Māori
मराठी
Монгол
ဗမာစာ
नेपाली
Norsk bokmål
پښتو
فارسی
Polski
Português
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
Română
Русский
Samoan
Gàidhlig
Српски језик
Sesotho
Shona
سنڌي
සිංහල
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
Afsoomaali
Español
Basa Sunda
Kiswahili
Svenska
Тоҷикӣ
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
ไทย
Türkçe
Українська
اردو
O‘zbekcha
Tiếng Việt
Cymraeg
isiXhosa
יידיש
Yorùbá
Zulu
Phone: 312-714-2800
May 2022 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 -
Recent Posts
- Relief Application Waived if Not Filed by IJ’s Deadline, BIA Rules September 11, 2020
- BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 27 (3887 – 3984) Executive Office for Immigration Review 2017-2020 September 11, 2020
- Expunging, sealing criminal records, Illinois October 28, 2019
- CA7 finds that a deficient immigration court notice does not strip the immigration courts of authority to preside over the resulting removal proceedings May 22, 2019
- Federal Courts to Continue Funded Operations Until January 25 January 19, 2019
Archives
Categories
RSS Feed
- Relief Application Waived if Not Filed by IJ’s Deadline, BIA Rules September 12, 2020 Mike Baker
- BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 27 (3887 – 3984) Executive Office for Immigration Review 2017-2020 September 11, 2020 Mike Baker
Links
Tweets
- RT @SCOTUSblog: In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-b… https://t.co/hNk5cbp7kt 6 days
- In Patel v. Garland, For 5-4 Court (with Gorsuch writing for himself and the liberals in dissent), Barrett holds th… https://t.co/34M7eO8Q43 6 days
- Garland says judges may consider criminal illegal immigrants' mental health when considering asylum claims https://t.co/eQgD4S0bUc 2 weeks
- Call for Papers: AILA Law Journal, Fall 2022 Edition https://t.co/WPMPiuNKHl 2 weeks
- Pew Research Center: Afro-Latinos are about 2% of U.S. adult population and 12% of Latino adults but almost one-in-… https://t.co/63fp7jP8tp 2 weeks
- EOIR'S Introduction to Immigration Court https://t.co/jCsHXuwcLl 2 weeks
-
Tag Archives: Motion to Reopen
CA7 denies motion to reopen filed almost nine years from the final administrative removal order
Patel v Holder, Case No. 13-2442 (C.A. 7. Apr. 1, 2014) Jyotsnaben and Pravin Patel petition for review of a denial by the Board of Immigration Appeals of their motion to reopen their removal proceedings. The Patels moved to reopen … Continue reading
Motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of the dismissal of the Board appeal, regardless of the pendency of a motion to reconsider the removal order.
Doc Uploaded Filed Description 1 04/25/2012 04/25/2012 Oral Argument 2 05/21/2012 05/21/2012 Opinion (TINDER) Leonida M. SARMIENTO and Romeo L. Sarmiento, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. No. 11–2841. Argued April 25, 2012. … Continue reading