-
Afrikaans
Shqip
አማርኛ
العربية
Հայերեն
Azərbaycan dili
Euskara
Беларуская мова
বাংলা
Bosanski
Български
Català
Cebuano
Chichewa
简体中文
繁體中文
Corsu
Hrvatski
Čeština
Dansk
Nederlands
English
Esperanto
Eesti
Filipino
Suomi
Français
Frysk
Galego
ქართული
Deutsch
Greek
ગુજરાતી
Kreyol ayisyen
Harshen Hausa
Ōlelo Hawaiʻi
עִבְרִית
हिन्दी
Hmong
Magyar
Íslenska
Igbo
Bahasa Indonesia
Gaelige
Italiano
日本語
Basa Jawa
ಕನ್ನಡ
Қазақ тілі
ភាសាខ្មែរ
한국어
كوردی
Кыргызча
ພາສາລາວ
Latin
Latviešu valoda
Lietuvių kalba
Lëtzebuergesch
Македонски јазик
Malagasy
Bahasa Melayu
മലയാളം
Maltese
Te Reo Māori
मराठी
Монгол
ဗမာစာ
नेपाली
Norsk bokmål
پښتو
فارسی
Polski
Português
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
Română
Русский
Samoan
Gàidhlig
Српски језик
Sesotho
Shona
سنڌي
සිංහල
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
Afsoomaali
Español
Basa Sunda
Kiswahili
Svenska
Тоҷикӣ
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
ไทย
Türkçe
Українська
اردو
O‘zbekcha
Tiếng Việt
Cymraeg
isiXhosa
יידיש
Yorùbá
Zulu
Phone: 312-714-2800
May 2022 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 -
Recent Posts
- Relief Application Waived if Not Filed by IJ’s Deadline, BIA Rules September 11, 2020
- BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 27 (3887 – 3984) Executive Office for Immigration Review 2017-2020 September 11, 2020
- Expunging, sealing criminal records, Illinois October 28, 2019
- CA7 finds that a deficient immigration court notice does not strip the immigration courts of authority to preside over the resulting removal proceedings May 22, 2019
- Federal Courts to Continue Funded Operations Until January 25 January 19, 2019
Archives
Categories
RSS Feed
- Relief Application Waived if Not Filed by IJ’s Deadline, BIA Rules September 12, 2020 Mike Baker
- BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 27 (3887 – 3984) Executive Office for Immigration Review 2017-2020 September 11, 2020 Mike Baker
Links
Tweets
- RT @SCOTUSblog: In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-b… https://t.co/hNk5cbp7kt 6 days
- In Patel v. Garland, For 5-4 Court (with Gorsuch writing for himself and the liberals in dissent), Barrett holds th… https://t.co/34M7eO8Q43 6 days
- Garland says judges may consider criminal illegal immigrants' mental health when considering asylum claims https://t.co/eQgD4S0bUc 2 weeks
- Call for Papers: AILA Law Journal, Fall 2022 Edition https://t.co/WPMPiuNKHl 2 weeks
- Pew Research Center: Afro-Latinos are about 2% of U.S. adult population and 12% of Latino adults but almost one-in-… https://t.co/63fp7jP8tp 2 weeks
- EOIR'S Introduction to Immigration Court https://t.co/jCsHXuwcLl 2 weeks
-
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Recent Cases United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit (October 2017-December 2018. CA7)
Alvarenga-Flores v. Sessions Citation Case Number: No. 17-2920 Decision Date: August 28, 2018 Federal District: Petition for Review, Order of Bd. of Immigration Appeals Holding: Petition denied Record contained sufficient evidence to support IJ’s denial of application for asylum relief, … Continue reading
Posted in 7th Circuit, 7th Circuit Cases- Aliens, Administrative Procedure Act, Asylum, Cancellation of Removal for Non-Lawful Permanent Residents, I-751 petition, Motion to Reopen, remove residency conditions, U nonimmigrant status, U-Visa, Uncategorized, Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, violating order of protection, writ of mandamus
Leave a comment
CA7 lacked jurisdiction to review BIA denial of discretionary 212(h) waiver where alien was involved in violent or dangerous crime
Bd. did not err in reversing IJ’s grant of alien’s application for waiver of inadmissibility under section 212(h) of INA, where: (1) alien became removable based on his prior conviction on charge of unarmed bank robbery, which, in turn, resulted … Continue reading
CA7 upholds IJ denial of Kyrgyzstan political asylum application
Record contained sufficient evidence to support IJ’s denial of alien’s asylum petition on grounds that alien was not credible, even though alien claimed that he faced persecution for his political activism as member of youth wing of political opposition party … Continue reading
Cancellation of Removal for Non-Lawful Permanent Residents under INA Section 240A(b)(1)
Statutory Eligibility. To be eligible for cancellation of removal under INA § 240A(b), the applicant must establish that s/he (1) has been physically present in the United States for a continuous period of not less than 10 years immediately preceding … Continue reading
Posted in Cancellation of Removal, Cancellation Of Removal and The Stop-Time Rule, Cancellation of Removal for Non LPRS under INA Section 240A(b)(1), Cancellation of Removal for Non-Lawful Permanent Residents, Non-LPR cancellation, Uncategorized, Voluntary Departure At Conclusion of Proceedings
Comments Off on Cancellation of Removal for Non-Lawful Permanent Residents under INA Section 240A(b)(1)
Effects of Removal (Deportation) on Retirement or Disability Beneficiaries
Can I receive Social Security benefits if I have been deported? How does deportation or removal from the United States affect the receipt of benefits? Once the Department of Homeland Security notifies the Social Security Administration that an individual has … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment