-
Afrikaans
Shqip
አማርኛ
العربية
Հայերեն
Azərbaycan dili
Euskara
Беларуская мова
বাংলা
Bosanski
Български
Català
Cebuano
Chichewa
简体中文
繁體中文
Corsu
Hrvatski
Čeština
Dansk
Nederlands
English
Esperanto
Eesti
Filipino
Suomi
Français
Frysk
Galego
ქართული
Deutsch
Greek
ગુજરાતી
Kreyol ayisyen
Harshen Hausa
Ōlelo Hawaiʻi
עִבְרִית
हिन्दी
Hmong
Magyar
Íslenska
Igbo
Bahasa Indonesia
Gaelige
Italiano
日本語
Basa Jawa
ಕನ್ನಡ
Қазақ тілі
ភាសាខ្មែរ
한국어
كوردی
Кыргызча
ພາສາລາວ
Latin
Latviešu valoda
Lietuvių kalba
Lëtzebuergesch
Македонски јазик
Malagasy
Bahasa Melayu
മലയാളം
Maltese
Te Reo Māori
मराठी
Монгол
ဗမာစာ
नेपाली
Norsk bokmål
پښتو
فارسی
Polski
Português
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
Română
Русский
Samoan
Gàidhlig
Српски језик
Sesotho
Shona
سنڌي
සිංහල
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
Afsoomaali
Español
Basa Sunda
Kiswahili
Svenska
Тоҷикӣ
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
ไทย
Türkçe
Українська
اردو
O‘zbekcha
Tiếng Việt
Cymraeg
isiXhosa
יידיש
Yorùbá
Zulu
Phone: 312-714-2800
May 2022 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 -
Recent Posts
- Relief Application Waived if Not Filed by IJ’s Deadline, BIA Rules September 11, 2020
- BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 27 (3887 – 3984) Executive Office for Immigration Review 2017-2020 September 11, 2020
- Expunging, sealing criminal records, Illinois October 28, 2019
- CA7 finds that a deficient immigration court notice does not strip the immigration courts of authority to preside over the resulting removal proceedings May 22, 2019
- Federal Courts to Continue Funded Operations Until January 25 January 19, 2019
Archives
Categories
RSS Feed
- Relief Application Waived if Not Filed by IJ’s Deadline, BIA Rules September 12, 2020 Mike Baker
- BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 27 (3887 – 3984) Executive Office for Immigration Review 2017-2020 September 11, 2020 Mike Baker
Links
Tweets
- RT @SCOTUSblog: In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-b… https://t.co/hNk5cbp7kt 6 days
- In Patel v. Garland, For 5-4 Court (with Gorsuch writing for himself and the liberals in dissent), Barrett holds th… https://t.co/34M7eO8Q43 6 days
- Garland says judges may consider criminal illegal immigrants' mental health when considering asylum claims https://t.co/eQgD4S0bUc 2 weeks
- Call for Papers: AILA Law Journal, Fall 2022 Edition https://t.co/WPMPiuNKHl 2 weeks
- Pew Research Center: Afro-Latinos are about 2% of U.S. adult population and 12% of Latino adults but almost one-in-… https://t.co/63fp7jP8tp 2 weeks
- EOIR'S Introduction to Immigration Court https://t.co/jCsHXuwcLl 2 weeks
-
Category Archives: Cancellation of Removal
CA7 Holds ‘Stop-Time Rule’ May Not Be Applied Retroactively to reach offenses that were committed before the rule’s effective date on April 1, 1997
Jeudy has been a lawful permanent resident since 1989, and he reached seven years of continuous residence in 1996. The BIA, however, applied the “stop-time rule” of § 1229b(d)(1), which took effect in 1997 as part of the Illegal Immigration … Continue reading
CA7 lacks jurisdiction to review Mexican cancellation as grounds for relief sought are discretionary
Petitioner, a citizen and native of Mexico, appealed the BIA’s affirmance of the IJ’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. The court held that the courts of appeal lack jurisdiction to review the denial of discretionary relief in … Continue reading
CA7 Upholds Denial of Continuance for Petitioner with Multiple Traffic Violations
The court held that there was enough evidence before the IJ and BIA to conclude that petitioner lacked the good moral character necessary for cancellation, and that the outcome of the latest criminal proceeding was immaterial. Bd. did not err … Continue reading
CA7 finds alien’s continuous presence in the United States ends upon the service of a Notice to Appear on the alien, even if that notice is missing the date and time of the initial hearing.
An alien otherwise inadmissible can be eligible for cancellation of removal if, among other things, he establishes that he “has been physically present in the United States for a continuous period of at least ten (10) years immediately preceding the … Continue reading
CA7 upholds denial of non LPR Cancellation of Removal due to aggravated felony conviction for domestic battery
§ 1229b. Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status (a) Cancellation of removal for certain permanent residents. The Attorney General may cancel removal in the case of an alien who is inadmissible or deportable from the United States if the alien– … Continue reading