Phone: 312-714-2800
-
Recent Posts
- The Floor Drops Out — Three Rulings in Thirty Days Dismantle the Deferred Action Safety Net for SIJ and DACA Recipients May 9, 2026
- BIA Kills “Married Mexican Women Unable to Leave” as a Cognizable Social Group in Matter of V-A-B- — And Reverses the IJ on Marriage, Government Protection, and Internal Relocation May 8, 2026
- D.C. Circuit Kills Trump’s Border Invasion Removal Order in RAICES v. Mullin — Every Summary Deportation Without Asylum Review Violates Federal April 30, 2026
- Second Circuit: Long-Term EWI Residents Are Not “Seeking Admission” — Bond Hearings Required | Cunha v. Freden April 29, 2026
- DACA Doesn’t End Removal — BIA Reverses IJ Who Terminated Proceedings Without Weighing DHS Opposition April 25, 2026
Archives
Categories
RSS FeedLinks
- CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD)
- Law Offices of Michael D. Baker
-
Category Archives: Consular non-reviewability
CA7 upholds Dist. Ct. dismissal of appeal under Administrative Procedure Act seeking to review denial of visa application
Morfin v. Tillerson, No. 15-3633 (7th Cir. 2017) Dist. Ct. did not err in dismissing plaintiff-alien’s action under Administrative Procedure Act, seeking to review denial of visa application as part of his process to obtain permanent resident status, where consular … Continue reading
CA7 affirms rejection of mandamus petition seeking review of denial of visa application by consular official
Yusev v. Sessions, No. 16-1338 (7th Cir. 2017) Dist. Ct. did not err in dismissing plaintiff-aliens’ petition for writ of mandamus seeking review of denial of plaintiff’s visa application by consular official during plaintiff’s process of becoming permanent resident. Consular … Continue reading
SCOTUS does not require government to identify a specific statutory provision nor give detailed explanation for denying a visa based on terrorism-related ground
Respondent Fauzia Din petitioned to have her husband, Kanishka Berashk, a resident citizen of Afghanistan and former civil servant in the Taliban regime, classified as an “immediate relative” entitled to priority immigration status. Din’s petition was approved, but Berashk’s visa … Continue reading