-
Afrikaans
Shqip
አማርኛ
العربية
Հայերեն
Azərbaycan dili
Euskara
Беларуская мова
বাংলা
Bosanski
Български
Català
Cebuano
Chichewa
简体中文
繁體中文
Corsu
Hrvatski
Čeština
Dansk
Nederlands
English
Esperanto
Eesti
Filipino
Suomi
Français
Frysk
Galego
ქართული
Deutsch
Greek
ગુજરાતી
Kreyol ayisyen
Harshen Hausa
Ōlelo Hawaiʻi
עִבְרִית
हिन्दी
Hmong
Magyar
Íslenska
Igbo
Bahasa Indonesia
Gaelige
Italiano
日本語
Basa Jawa
ಕನ್ನಡ
Қазақ тілі
ភាសាខ្មែរ
한국어
كوردی
Кыргызча
ພາສາລາວ
Latin
Latviešu valoda
Lietuvių kalba
Lëtzebuergesch
Македонски јазик
Malagasy
Bahasa Melayu
മലയാളം
Maltese
Te Reo Māori
मराठी
Монгол
ဗမာစာ
नेपाली
Norsk bokmål
پښتو
فارسی
Polski
Português
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
Română
Русский
Samoan
Gàidhlig
Српски језик
Sesotho
Shona
سنڌي
සිංහල
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
Afsoomaali
Español
Basa Sunda
Kiswahili
Svenska
Тоҷикӣ
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
ไทย
Türkçe
Українська
اردو
O‘zbekcha
Tiếng Việt
Cymraeg
isiXhosa
יידיש
Yorùbá
Zulu
Phone: 312-714-2800
April 2021 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 -
Recent Posts
- Relief Application Waived if Not Filed by IJ’s Deadline, BIA Rules September 11, 2020
- BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 27 (3887 – 3984) Executive Office for Immigration Review 2017-2020 September 11, 2020
- Expunging, sealing criminal records, Illinois October 28, 2019
- CA7 finds that a deficient immigration court notice does not strip the immigration courts of authority to preside over the resulting removal proceedings May 22, 2019
- Federal Courts to Continue Funded Operations Until January 25 January 19, 2019
Archives
Categories
RSS Feed
- Relief Application Waived if Not Filed by IJ’s Deadline, BIA Rules September 12, 2020 Mike Baker
- BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 27 (3887 – 3984) Executive Office for Immigration Review 2017-2020 September 11, 2020 Mike Baker
Links
Tweets
- Immigration Article of the Day: Pleading the Fifth in Immigration Court: A Regulatory Proposal by Tania N. Valdez https://t.co/CQmC85zUNY 12 hours
- Raquel Aldana: "Citizenism" and the Shackles of Borders https://t.co/eeYMA2jTgy 18 hours
- Restoring Asylum: The Challenges of “Building Back Better” at the Border https://t.co/SI0obaK5Rb 18 hours
- Call For Papers--AALS 2022, New Voices in Immigration Law https://t.co/lNvjS5EGsY 1 day
- Biden Budget Immigration Priorities Differ from Trump's https://t.co/DBsuDgSoaF 2 days
- Immigration and family separation policies at the US border inspire comic book ‘Home’ https://t.co/dacQ9eSkJU 2 days
-
Category Archives: Aliens
The Removal of Irregular Migrants in Europe and America, by Stephen H. Legomsky, Washington University in Saint Louis – School of Law
“If there is a clear trend in the world’s contemporary immigration debates, it is the ascendancy of irregular migration to center stage. The preoccupation with irregular migration in turn has spawned increased attention to, and policy prioritization of, the removal … Continue reading
Posted in Aliens, Deportation, European Union, Immigration, migration, readmission, Removal, United States
Leave a comment
The Nasty Ripple Effects of Alabama’s Immigration Law
The “Birmingham campaign” to end segregation and other forms of discrimination garnered international attention in 1963 when the city’s infamous Commissioner of Public Safety “Bull” Connor unleashed police dogs and fire hoses on black children engaging in peaceful protest. Those … Continue reading
Chinese asylum, Christian faith, past persecution. Ni v. Holder (7th Cir., March 25, 2011)
Bd. did not err in denying asylum request by alien (native of China) after finding that alien had failed to establish that he had personally been victim of past persecution on basis of his Christian religion or that he was … Continue reading
Non-LPR cancellation & possession of drug paraphernalia. Barma v. Holder (7th Cir., April 5, 2011)
Bd. did not err in finding that alien (native of Canada) was subject to removal based on his presence in US beyond his 6-month visa, and that alien did not qualify for cancellation of removal under 8 USC section 1182(a)(2) … Continue reading
Reinstatement removal order: Tapia-Lemos v. Holder (7th Cir., April 7, 2011)
The Seventh Circuit dismissed petitioner’s petition for review from a reinstatement removal order finding that petitioner had failed to file within the statutorily required 30 days after the reinstatement was entered. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). The Court rejected petitioner’s argument … Continue reading