Monthly Archives: March 2012

Vartelas v. Holder (03/28/2012) – Supreme Court

Posted on March 30, 2012 by Mike Baker

The court held that if the basis for inadmissibility is a pre-April 1, 1997 plea, and if the LPR’s trip/s outside the U.S., taken at any time, are “brief, casual and innocent,” then the person is treated like a returning … Continue reading →

Posted in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(13)(C)(v), Rights of lawful permanent residents, Rosenberg v. Fleuti, U.S. Supreme Court | Leave a comment

DHS prosecutorial discretion enforcement policies and practices.

Posted on March 22, 2012 by Mike Baker

CLINIC recently posted a Prosecutorial Discretion Toolkit on its website that contains the government documents, articles, sample letters and motions, practice advisories and other materials to help nonprofit attorneys, accredited representatives and advocates understand DHS prosecutorial discretion enforcement policies and … Continue reading →

Posted in Prosecutorial discretion | Tagged | Leave a comment

A View Through The Looking Glass: How Crimes Appear From The Immigration Court Perspective

Posted on March 18, 2012 by Mike Baker

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this Article is to provide a basic overview of a body of law that has been compared as second only to tax law in its complexity.  Our goal is to highlight the major areas where criminal laws … Continue reading →

Posted in Aggravated felony, AGGRAVATED FELONY CASE SUMMARY, BIA, CIMT, Citizenship, Crime involving moral turpitude, Immigration law | Tagged | Comments Off on A View Through The Looking Glass: How Crimes Appear From The Immigration Court Perspective

Seventh Circuit Upholds Warrantless Search of Cell Phones-USA v. Abel Flores-Lopez

Posted on March 3, 2012 by Mike Baker

Police currently have wide latitude to search the contents of cell phones – including text messages, voice mails, photos, Internet browsing history, and reams of other data – when searching an arrestee incident to arrest. In the Flores-Lopez case, an … Continue reading →

Posted in Fourth Amendment, GPS Surveillance, U.S. Supreme Court, Uncategorized | Leave a comment