Illinois’ ‘Julie’s Law’ to stiffen consequences for extreme speeders starting July 1, 2013

The law, which takes effect July 1, 2013, bars judges from giving court supervision, a form of probation, to drivers found traveling more than 25 mph over the limit on a nonrural road or more than 30 mph on a highway. The previous law allowed the probation for drivers caught driving up to 40 mph over the limit.

Gov. Pat Quinn signed “Julie’s Law” bill at Lincoln-Way North High School in Frankfort on July 20, 2012. The legislation was written in response to this two-vehicle crash that killed  17-year-old Julie Gorczynski one week after graduation in June 2011 when a Mazda smashed into the passenger side of her friend’s Jeep. The 21-year-old Mazda driver, Lukasz Marszalek, who had a history of speeding violations for which the courts repeatedly gave him court supervisions, was traveling at least 76 mph in a 40 mph zone, police said. The new law will tighten consequences for excessive speeders: http://bit.ly/JuliesLaw

Posted in 'Julie's Law' to stiffen consequences for extreme speeders, 25 mph over the limit, more than 30 mph on a highway, Speeding ticket in Illinois | Leave a comment

USCIS Issues Final Memorandum on Timeframes for Responses to RFEs

In July 2011, [FN1] U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released to the public an interim policy memorandum (IPM) dated July 7, 2011, changing the amount of time USCIS officers may provide an applicant or petitioner to respond to a request for evidence (RFE), eliminating the tiered approach to establishing RFE response *1335 times, and providing applicants and petitioners residing outside the U.S. who are responding to RFEs with additional mailing time. USCIS has now released the final version of this memorandum. Like the IPM, the final PM is dated July 7, 2011, entitled “Change in Standard Timeframes for Applicants or Petitioners to Respond to Requests for Evidence; Revisions to Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM) Chapter 10.5(b), Chapter 25.2(e)(3), Chapter 38.1(e)(6), and Appendix 10-9; AFM Update AD11-36,” and numbered PM-602-0040. The final PM is unchanged from the IPM.

The PM explains that previous guidance provided USCIS officers the flexibility to determine individual response times for RFEs tailored to the circumstances of each case but this delegated flexibility led to inconsistencies in the RFE process. The PM seeks to further USCIS’ goal of improving consistency in its policies and adjudications by amending the standard timeframes USCIS provides for responding to RFEs and by limiting the use of discretion to reduce the response time from the standard timeframes. Accordingly, the PM amends the standard timeframes listed in Appendix 10-9 of the AFM to include a standard timeframe of 30 days for Form I-539, Application To Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status, and a standard timeframe of 84 days for all other form types, regardless of whether the request is for initial or additional evidence, or whether the evidence is available in the U.S. or is obtained from overseas sources.

The PM permits USCIS officers to reduce the response time from the standard timeframes only after obtaining supervisory concurrence.

The PM also provides that the maximum response time for an RFE may not exceed 12 weeks (84 days), but that, when an RFE is served by mail, USCIS officers should include additional mailing time for the RFE to reach the applicant or petitioner and for the response to reach USCIS. The standard mailing time established by 8 CFR § 103.5a(b) is three days; however, as a matter of policy, USCIS has determined that the mailing time should be longer when the applicant or petitioner is residing outside the U.S. Accordingly, Appendix 10-9 of the AFM is amended to include appropriate mailing times in addition to standard response times.

The PM notes that it does not apply to asylum applications or applications for relief under § 203 of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act [FN3] (NACARA 203). Pursuant to 8 CFR § 208.9(e), an asylum officer may, as a matter of discretion, grant a brief extension of time following an interview during which the asylum applicant may submit additional evidence. 8 CFR § 240.67(b)(6) contains a similar provision for NACARA 203 applicants.

[FN1] The PM, including the revisions to the AFM, is reproduced here.

[FN2]. USCIS Issues Interim Memorandum on Timeframes for Responses to RFEs  (July 18, 2011).

[FN3]. Pub. L. No. 105-100, 111 Stat. 2160 (Nov. 19, 1997), codified in scattered sections of 8 USCA. NACARA § 203 provides that certain Guatemalans, Salvadorans, and nationals of former Soviet Bloc countries are eligible to apply for cancellation of removal under the standards for suspension of deportation similar to those that existed prior to enactment of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009-563 (Sept. 30, 1996).

Posted in Request for evidence (RFE), RFE | Tagged | Leave a comment

USCIS Issues Final Memorandum on Definition of “Internationally Recognized” for P-1 Classifications

In January 2011, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a draft policy memorandum (PM) entitled “Clarifying Guidance on Definition of ‘Internationally Recognized’ for the P-1 Classification; Revisions to the Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM) Chapter 33.5(a) AFM Update AD 11-03,” and proposing to revise AFM Chapter 33.5(a) to provide guidance for processing and adjudicating Forms I-129, Petitions for Nonimmigrant Worker, filed on behalf of P-1 nonimmigrants with regard to whether the definition of “internationally recognized entertainment groups” encompasses only foreign-based groups. USCIS sought public comments on the draft PM and has now issued the PM in final form. This PM supersedes prior policy guidance regarding the definition of “internationally recognized entertainment groups” and updates the AFM.

The final Policy Memorandum (PM) can be downloaded here.

Posted in "culturally unique”, P visa | Leave a comment

USCIS Releases Executive Summary of EB-5 Engagement

On May 1, 2012, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS’)
Office of Public Engagement and its Service Center Operations
Directorate conducted a stakeholder engagement to discuss the EB-5
Immigrant Investor program, focusing on general EB-5 issues. During the
session, USCIS provided a summary of the EB-5 receipts, approvals, and
denials, and subject-matter experts from USCIS and the Department
of State (DOS) answered questions from participants. USCIS has now
issued its executive summary of the engagement. Questions addressed
pertained to processing times and procedures, I-526 immigration
petitions by alien entrepreneurs, I-829 petitions by entrepreneurs to
remove conditions, I-924 applications for regional centers under the
immigrant investor pilot program, EB-5 visa allocations, customer
services, premium processing, troubled company designations,
diversification, the definition of “new commercial enterprise,”
permissible expenditures, refundable fees, job creation, geographic
designations, profit requirements, new hires, bridge financing,
nonprofit organizations, EB-5 filings by F-1 students, sources of funds,
requests for evidence (RFEs), when a final policy memorandum will be
released, and the EB-5 sunset (set for September 30, 2012, if not
extended by Congress). The executive summary is reproduced here.

Posted in EB-5 Immigrant Investor | Tagged | Leave a comment

BREAKING: Janet Napolitano said eligible undocumented immigrants can apply for deferred deportation August 15, 2012

From Fronteras Desk:

Secretary Napolitano testified before the House Judiciary Committee, mostly related to deferred deportation and temporary work permits for undocumented immigrants brought here as children. Unsurprisingly, Democrats praised Napolitano and Republicans were harshly critical. Arizona Congressman Ben Quayle said the new policy could create precedent for other agencies to disregard the law.

“What can we do as legislators to make sure that we get the laws that are passed actually, fully enforced by the executive branch?” Quayle asked.

“You know, Representative, I’ve been an executive my whole career, so it’s really hard for me to get into that legislative mindset. I’ll leave that for you,” Napolitano replied. “But I will say, we are enforcing the laws. We’ve removed more people from this country than any prior administration over a similar time period.”

Napolitano said eligible undocumented immigrants can start applying for deferred deportation Aug. 15, and that we can expect more information on the policy Aug. 1.

Posted in Deferred Action Status, Dream Act, Illinois DREAM Act, prosecuting illegal aliens, Prosecutorial discretion | Tagged , | Leave a comment