USCIS Issues Final Memorandum on Timeframes for Responses to RFEs

In July 2011, [FN1] U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released to the public an interim policy memorandum (IPM) dated July 7, 2011, changing the amount of time USCIS officers may provide an applicant or petitioner to respond to a request for evidence (RFE), eliminating the tiered approach to establishing RFE response *1335 times, and providing applicants and petitioners residing outside the U.S. who are responding to RFEs with additional mailing time. USCIS has now released the final version of this memorandum. Like the IPM, the final PM is dated July 7, 2011, entitled “Change in Standard Timeframes for Applicants or Petitioners to Respond to Requests for Evidence; Revisions to Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM) Chapter 10.5(b), Chapter 25.2(e)(3), Chapter 38.1(e)(6), and Appendix 10-9; AFM Update AD11-36,” and numbered PM-602-0040. The final PM is unchanged from the IPM.

The PM explains that previous guidance provided USCIS officers the flexibility to determine individual response times for RFEs tailored to the circumstances of each case but this delegated flexibility led to inconsistencies in the RFE process. The PM seeks to further USCIS’ goal of improving consistency in its policies and adjudications by amending the standard timeframes USCIS provides for responding to RFEs and by limiting the use of discretion to reduce the response time from the standard timeframes. Accordingly, the PM amends the standard timeframes listed in Appendix 10-9 of the AFM to include a standard timeframe of 30 days for Form I-539, Application To Extend/Change Nonimmigrant Status, and a standard timeframe of 84 days for all other form types, regardless of whether the request is for initial or additional evidence, or whether the evidence is available in the U.S. or is obtained from overseas sources.

The PM permits USCIS officers to reduce the response time from the standard timeframes only after obtaining supervisory concurrence.

The PM also provides that the maximum response time for an RFE may not exceed 12 weeks (84 days), but that, when an RFE is served by mail, USCIS officers should include additional mailing time for the RFE to reach the applicant or petitioner and for the response to reach USCIS. The standard mailing time established by 8 CFR § 103.5a(b) is three days; however, as a matter of policy, USCIS has determined that the mailing time should be longer when the applicant or petitioner is residing outside the U.S. Accordingly, Appendix 10-9 of the AFM is amended to include appropriate mailing times in addition to standard response times.

The PM notes that it does not apply to asylum applications or applications for relief under § 203 of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act [FN3] (NACARA 203). Pursuant to 8 CFR § 208.9(e), an asylum officer may, as a matter of discretion, grant a brief extension of time following an interview during which the asylum applicant may submit additional evidence. 8 CFR § 240.67(b)(6) contains a similar provision for NACARA 203 applicants.

[FN1] The PM, including the revisions to the AFM, is reproduced here.

[FN2]. USCIS Issues Interim Memorandum on Timeframes for Responses to RFEs  (July 18, 2011).

[FN3]. Pub. L. No. 105-100, 111 Stat. 2160 (Nov. 19, 1997), codified in scattered sections of 8 USCA. NACARA § 203 provides that certain Guatemalans, Salvadorans, and nationals of former Soviet Bloc countries are eligible to apply for cancellation of removal under the standards for suspension of deportation similar to those that existed prior to enactment of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009-563 (Sept. 30, 1996).

Posted in Request for evidence (RFE), RFE | Tagged | Leave a comment

USCIS Issues Final Memorandum on Definition of “Internationally Recognized” for P-1 Classifications

In January 2011, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a draft policy memorandum (PM) entitled “Clarifying Guidance on Definition of ‘Internationally Recognized’ for the P-1 Classification; Revisions to the Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM) Chapter 33.5(a) AFM Update AD 11-03,” and proposing to revise AFM Chapter 33.5(a) to provide guidance for processing and adjudicating Forms I-129, Petitions for Nonimmigrant Worker, filed on behalf of P-1 nonimmigrants with regard to whether the definition of “internationally recognized entertainment groups” encompasses only foreign-based groups. USCIS sought public comments on the draft PM and has now issued the PM in final form. This PM supersedes prior policy guidance regarding the definition of “internationally recognized entertainment groups” and updates the AFM.

The final Policy Memorandum (PM) can be downloaded here.

Posted in "culturally unique”, P visa | Leave a comment

USCIS Releases Executive Summary of EB-5 Engagement

On May 1, 2012, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS’)
Office of Public Engagement and its Service Center Operations
Directorate conducted a stakeholder engagement to discuss the EB-5
Immigrant Investor program, focusing on general EB-5 issues. During the
session, USCIS provided a summary of the EB-5 receipts, approvals, and
denials, and subject-matter experts from USCIS and the Department
of State (DOS) answered questions from participants. USCIS has now
issued its executive summary of the engagement. Questions addressed
pertained to processing times and procedures, I-526 immigration
petitions by alien entrepreneurs, I-829 petitions by entrepreneurs to
remove conditions, I-924 applications for regional centers under the
immigrant investor pilot program, EB-5 visa allocations, customer
services, premium processing, troubled company designations,
diversification, the definition of “new commercial enterprise,”
permissible expenditures, refundable fees, job creation, geographic
designations, profit requirements, new hires, bridge financing,
nonprofit organizations, EB-5 filings by F-1 students, sources of funds,
requests for evidence (RFEs), when a final policy memorandum will be
released, and the EB-5 sunset (set for September 30, 2012, if not
extended by Congress). The executive summary is reproduced here.

Posted in EB-5 Immigrant Investor | Tagged | Leave a comment

BREAKING: Janet Napolitano said eligible undocumented immigrants can apply for deferred deportation August 15, 2012

From Fronteras Desk:

Secretary Napolitano testified before the House Judiciary Committee, mostly related to deferred deportation and temporary work permits for undocumented immigrants brought here as children. Unsurprisingly, Democrats praised Napolitano and Republicans were harshly critical. Arizona Congressman Ben Quayle said the new policy could create precedent for other agencies to disregard the law.

“What can we do as legislators to make sure that we get the laws that are passed actually, fully enforced by the executive branch?” Quayle asked.

“You know, Representative, I’ve been an executive my whole career, so it’s really hard for me to get into that legislative mindset. I’ll leave that for you,” Napolitano replied. “But I will say, we are enforcing the laws. We’ve removed more people from this country than any prior administration over a similar time period.”

Napolitano said eligible undocumented immigrants can start applying for deferred deportation Aug. 15, and that we can expect more information on the policy Aug. 1.

Posted in Deferred Action Status, Dream Act, Illinois DREAM Act, prosecuting illegal aliens, Prosecutorial discretion | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Deferred Action Process for Young People Who Are Low Enforcement Priorities

Release Date: June 15, 2012

WASHINGTON— Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano today announced that effective immediately, certain young people who were brought to the United States as young children, do not present a risk to national security or public safety, and meet several key criteria will be considered for relief from removal from the country or from entering into removal proceedings. Those who demonstrate that they meet the criteria will be eligible to receive deferred action for a period of two years, subject to renewal, and will be eligible to apply for work authorization.

“Our nation’s immigration laws must be enforced in a firm and sensible manner,” said Secretary Napolitano. “But they are not designed to be blindly enforced without consideration given to the individual circumstances of each case. Nor are they designed to remove productive young people to countries where they may not have lived or even speak the language. Discretion, which is used in so many other areas, is especially justified here.”

DHS continues to focus its enforcement resources on the removal of individuals who pose a national security or public safety risk, including immigrants convicted of crimes, violent criminals, felons, and repeat immigration law offenders. Today’s action further enhances the Department’s ability to focus on these priority removals.

Under this directive, individuals who demonstrate that they meet the following criteria will be eligible for an exercise of discretion, specifically deferred action, on a case by case basis:

  1. Came to the United States under the age of sixteen;
  2. Have continuously resided in the United States for a least five years preceding the date of this memorandum and are present in the United States on the date of this memorandum;
  3. Are currently in school, have graduated from high school, have obtained a general education development certificate, or are honorably discharged veterans of the Coast Guard or Armed Forces of the United States;
  4. Have not been convicted of a felony offense, a significant misdemeanor offense, multiple misdemeanor offenses, or otherwise pose a threat to national security or public safety;
  5. Are not above the age of thirty.

Only those individuals who can prove through verifiable documentation that they meet these criteria will be eligible for deferred action. Individuals will not be eligible if they are not currently in the United States and cannot prove that they have been physically present in the United States for a period of not less than 5 years immediately preceding today’s date. Deferred action requests are decided on a case-by-case basis. DHS cannot provide any assurance that all such requests will be granted. The use of prosecutorial discretion confers no substantive right, immigration status, or pathway to citizenship. Only the Congress, acting through its legislative authority, can confer these rights.

For individuals who are in removal proceedings and have already been identified as meeting the eligibility criteria and have been offered an exercise of discretion as part of ICE’s ongoing case-by-case review, ICE will immediately begin to offer them deferred action for a period of two years, subject to renewal.

https://mikebakerlaw.com/blog/–skip-columns=guidwp-content/uploads/2012/06/s1-exercising-prosecutorial-discretion-individuals-who-came-to-us-as-children.pdf

“1. With respect to individuals who are encountered by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), or U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS):

  • With respect to individuals who meet the above criteria, ICE and CBP should immediately exercise their discretion, on an individual basis, in order to prevent low priority individuals from being placed into removal proceedings or removed from the United States.
  • USCIS is instructed to implement this memorandum consistent with its existing guidance regarding the issuance of notices to appear.

2. With respect to individuals who are in removal proceedings but not yet subject to a final order of removal, and who meet the above criteria:

  • ICE should exercise prosecutorial discretion, on an individual basis, for individuals who meet the above criteria by deferring action for a period of two years, subject to renewal, in order to prevent low priority individuals from being removed from the United States.
  • ICE is instructed to use its Office of the Public Advocate to permit individuals who believe they meet the above criteria to identify themselves through a clear and efficient process.
  • ICE is directed to begin implementing this process within 60 days of the date of this memorandum.
  • ICE is also instructed to immediately begin the process of deferring action against individuals who meet the above criteria whose cases have already been identified through the ongoing review of pending cases before the Executive Office for Immigration Review.

3. With respect to the individuals who are not currently in removal proceedings and meet the above criteria, and pass a background check:

  • USCIS should establish a clear and efficient process for exercising prosecutorial discretion, on an individual basis, by deferring action against individuals who meet the above criteria and are at least 15 years old, for a period oftwo years, subject to renewal, in order to prevent low priority individuals from being placed into removal proceedings or removed from the United States.
  • The USCIS process shall also be available to individuals subject to a final order of removal regardless of their age.
  • USCIS is directed to begin implementing this process within 60 days of the date of this memorandum. For individuals who are granted deferred action by either ICE or USCIS, USCIS shall accept applications to determine whether these individuals qualify for work authorization during this period of deferred action.

This memorandum confers no substantive right, immigration status or pathway to citizenship. Only the Congress, acting through its legislative authority, can confer these rights. It remains for the executive branch, however, to set forth policy for the exercise ofdiscretion within the framework of the existing law. I have done so here.”

La Secretaria Napolitano Anuncia Proceso De Acción Diferida Para Jóvenes Que Sean De Baja Prioridad Para La Aplicación De La Ley

La Secretaria Napolitano Anuncia Proceso De Acción Diferida Para Jóvenes Que Sean De Baja Prioridad Para La Aplicación De La Ley

15 de junio, 2012
Contacto: Oficina de Prensa del DHS, (202) 282-8010

WASHINGTON— La Secretaria de Seguridad Nacional, Janet Napolitano, anunció hoy que con vigencia inmediata, ciertos jóvenes que entraron en los Estados Unidos siendo niños jóvenes, que no presentan un riesgo para la seguridad nacional ni para la seguridad pública y que cumplen con varios criterios clave serán considerados para recibir alivio contra la deportación o contra el inicio del proceso de deportación. Aquéllos que demuestren que cumplen con los criterios serán elegibles para recibir la acción diferida durante un período de dos años, sujeto a renovación, y serán elegibles para solicitar la autorización de empleo.

“Las leyes de inmigración de nuestro país deben hacerse cumplir de una manera firme y sensata”, comentó la Secretaria Napolitano. “Pero no están diseñadas para hacerse cumplir ciegamente sin tener en cuenta las circunstancias individuales de cada caso. Ni están diseñadas para deportar a jóvenes productivos a países donde puede que no hayan vivido nunca o que ni siquiera hablen el idioma. En estos casos, la discreción, la cual se utiliza en tantas otras áreas, está especialmente justificada”.

El DHS continúa centrando sus recursos de aplicación de la ley en la deportación de individuos que presentan un peligro para la seguridad nacional o la seguridad pública, incluidos inmigrantes condenados por delitos, criminales violentos, delincuentes y transgresores reincidentes de la ley de inmigración. La acción de hoy mejora aún más la capacidad del Departamento para centrarse en estas deportaciones de máxima prioridad.

Bajo esta directiva, los individuos que demuestren que cumplen con los siguientes criterios serán elegibles para el ejercicio de la discreción, específicamente la acción diferida, considerado caso por caso:

1.) vino a los Estados Unidos siendo menor de dieciséis años de edad;

2.) ha residido ininterrumpidamente en los Estados Unidos durante al menos cinco años antes de la fecha de este memorándum y está presente en los Estados Unidos en la fecha de este memorándum;

3.) está asistiendo actualmente a la escuela, se ha graduado de la enseñanza secundaria, ha obtenido un certificado de desarrollo de educación general, o es un veterano que ha sido dado de alta con honores de los Guardacostas o las Fuerzas Armadas de los Estados Unidos;

4.) no ha sido condenado por un delito mayor, un delito menor significativo, múltiples delitos menores ni representa una amenaza para la seguridad nacional o la seguridad pública;

5.) no es mayor de treinta años de edad.

Sólo aquellos individuos que puedan demostrar mediante documentación verificable que cumplen con estos criterios serán elegibles para la acción diferida. Los individuos no serán elegibles si no se encuentran actualmente en los Estados Unidos y no pueden probar que han estado presentes físicamente en los Estados Unidos durante un período no inferior a 5 años inmediatamente anterior a la fecha de hoy. Las solicitudes de acción diferida se decidirán individualmente caso por caso. El DHS no puede dar ninguna garantía de que dichas solicitudes sean concedidas. El uso de la discreción procesal no otorga ningún derecho fundamental, estatus migratorio ni camino hacia la ciudadanía. Solo el Congreso, actuando a través de su autoridad legislativa, puede otorgar estos derechos.

Aunque esta guía entra en vigor inmediatamente, se espera que USCIS e ICE comiencen la implementación del proceso de solicitud en un plazo de sesenta días. Mientras tanto, los individuos que quieran más información sobre la nueva política deberán visitar la página web de USCIS (en www.uscis.gov), la página web de ICE (en www.ice.gov) o la página web del DHS (en www.dhs.gov). Comenzando el lunes, los individuos podrán llamar también a la línea de acceso directo de USCIS (al [insert number]) o a la línea de acceso directo de ICE (al [insert number]) durante el horario de trabajo si tienen preguntas o para pedir más información sobre el proceso próximo.

A los individuos que ya estén en el proceso de deportación y se haya demostrado que cumplen con los criterios de elegibilidad y se les haya ofrecido el ejercicio de la discreción como parte de la revisión individual en curso de casos de ICE, ICE comenzará a ofrecerles inmediatamente la acción diferida durante un período de dos años, sujeto a renovación.

Posted in Deferred Action Status, Deportation Policies, Illinois DREAM Act, prosecuting illegal aliens, Prosecutorial discretion | Tagged , | Leave a comment