Phone: 312-714-2800
September 2026 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 -
Recent Posts
- Matter of Diji: The Board Killed a 25-Year Notice Rule It Didn’t Need To September 4, 2026
- Protected From Deportation, Deported Anyway August 29, 2026
- USCIS Can Now Send Asylum Seekers to Immigration Court Without an Interview August 22, 2026
- The Public Charge Net Widens on September 18, 2026 August 19, 2026
- The Board Cuts the Right to Counsel Down to Ten Days August 15, 2026
Archives
Categories
RSS FeedLinks
- CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD)
- Law Offices of Michael D. Baker
-
Category Archives: withholding of removal
BIA Reverses Anglophone Withholding Grant in Matter of E-N-N- — Credibility Shortcuts and the Wrong Standard Cost This Case
⚖️ BIA Precedent Decision — 29 I&N Dec. 586 (BIA 2026) Matter of E-N-N-: IJ Finds Credibility, Gets the Standard Wrong, BIA Vacates Posted: April 23, 2026 | Citation: 29 I&N Dec. 586 (BIA 2026) | Decided: March 20, 2026 … Continue reading
Matter of G-C-I-: The BIA Just Rewrote the Rules for Credibility and Corroboration
The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) issued a landmark decision today that fundamentally reshapes how Immigration Judges can evaluate asylum seekers and other applicants for protection from removal. In Matter of G-C-I-, 29 I&N Dec. 176 (BIA 2025), decided on … Continue reading
CA7 dismissed application for withholding of removal for lack of jurisdiction, general fear of crime and extortion activity arising out of gang’s actions not enough
CA7 lacked jurisdiction to review alien’s appeal of Board Order denying his application for withholding of removal. Lopez admitted that he was removable based on his prior conviction on drug offense, and he did nor establish valid claim for withholding … Continue reading
CA7 lacked jurisdiction and cannot second-guess Bd.’s decision that conviction qualified as “particularly serious”
CA7 lacked jurisdiction to consider alien’s appeal of Bd.’s order finding that she was ineligible for relief on her application for withholding of removal due to her Wisconsin conviction on charge of first-degree reckless injury that arose out of incident … Continue reading
CA7 affirms denial of withholding of removal to Mexico and CAT relief; BIA fact-finding as to state-court conviction was harmless
Delgado-Arteaga v. Sessions, No. 16-1816 (7th Cir. 2017) Record contained sufficient evidence to support IJ’s order denying alien’s application for withholding of removal to Mexico, where said denial was based, in part, on finding that alien’s prior Illinois drug trafficking … Continue reading
