Category Archives: “new evidence” for purposes of an MTR

CA7 denies petition as Motion to Reopen was properly denied since evidence of future persecution could have been presented at original hearing-Salim v. Holder

Posted on September 24, 2013 by Mike Baker

Salim v. Holder, No. 12-3858 (August 28, 2013) Petition for Review, Order of Bd. of Immigration Appeals Petition denied Bd. did not err in denying alien’s motion to reopen asylum and withholding of removal proceedings, even though alien submitted new … Continue reading →

Posted in 7th Circuit, 7th Circuit Cases- Aliens, Motions to Reopen, past persecution, “new evidence” for purposes of an MTR | Leave a comment