Phone: 312-714-2800
-
Recent Posts
- Administrative Closure Explained: When Detention Means No Pause June 7, 2025
- Trump’s 2025 travel ban is back—overbroad, underinclusive, and unnecessary, but likely to survive in court as a policy spectacle, just like before. June 6, 2025
- Who Must Register Under the 1940 Alien Registration Law? | 2025 Immigration Compliance Guide May 31, 2025
- When Paperwork Errors Don’t End Cases: The New Rules for Defective NTAs After Lopez-Ticas May 29, 2025
- Court Says No: How the President’s Tariff Powers Were Put in Check May 28, 2025
Archives
Categories
RSS Feed
Links
- CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD)
- Law Offices of Michael D. Baker
-
Category Archives: 7th Circuit
Kim v. Holder CA7 ineligible to adjust status because failed to maintain continuous lawful nonimmigrant status
Bd. did not err in ordering alien’s removal after his petition to adjust his status to that of lawful permanent resident had been denied due to alien’s failure to establish that he had been in lawful immigration status for 180-day … Continue reading
CA7 denies Chinese Fujian Province Asylum based on family planning policy due to failure to present evidence of financial situation
Chen v. Holder Docket: 13-1758 Opinion Date: December 11, 2013 Chen faced deportation to Fujian Province and claimed to face a significant risk of persecution there because, since coming to the U.S. in 2002, she has given birth to two … Continue reading
CA7 denies petition as Motion to Reopen was properly denied since evidence of future persecution could have been presented at original hearing-Salim v. Holder
Salim v. Holder, No. 12-3858 (August 28, 2013) Petition for Review, Order of Bd. of Immigration Appeals Petition denied Bd. did not err in denying alien’s motion to reopen asylum and withholding of removal proceedings, even though alien submitted new … Continue reading
CA7 Remands Denied Asylum Claim for Political Activist from Belarus
Boika, a Belarusian citizen, entered the U.S. legally in 2006, but overstayed. At her removal proceedings, she applied for asylum under 8 U.S.C. 1158, withholding of removal under 8 U.S.C. 1231(b)(3), and relief pursuant to the Convention Against Torture. Her … Continue reading
CA7 finds deprivation of procedural rights when an immigration judge based decision on two hearsay documents
Pouhova’s petition for review is GRANTED and CA7 VACATED the Board’s orders affirming the immigration judge’s findings that (1) Pouhova’s testimony was not credible, (2) Pouhova was inadmissible for smuggling, (3) the government showed by clear and convinving evidence that … Continue reading