Phone: 312-714-2800
-
Recent Posts
- Soft Secession vs. Soft Fascism: How States Quietly Resist Federal Overreach August 22, 2025
- Cancellation of Removal: Understanding Deportation Relief for Non-Permanent Residents August 21, 2025
- With Chevron Gone: Timeline of Mandatory Detention and Rising Judicial Review in U.S. Immigration August 19, 2025
- Matter of G-C-I-: The BIA Just Rewrote the Rules for Credibility and Corroboration August 19, 2025
- DEFENDING OUR COMMUNITIES: FIGHTING DHS MOTIONS TO RECALENDAR August 16, 2025
Archives
Categories
RSS Feed
Links
- CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD)
- Law Offices of Michael D. Baker
-
Monthly Archives: July 2014
CA7 remands for reasoned analysis of evidence of past persection in Belarus
Sobaleva entered the U.S. on a student visa and applied for asylum, contending that the Belarusian government persecuted her for her political opinion before she left and likely would do so again if she were to return. She also requested … Continue reading
CA7 finds abuse of discretion in denial of Continuance pending adjudication of I-130
Denial of a continuance on the basis of a non-reason is an abuse of discretion. Yang v. Holder, Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit 2014 Yang, a citizen of China, entered the U.S. in 1998, as a tourist. In 2000, he … Continue reading
CA7 Upholds Denial of Continuance for Petitioner with Multiple Traffic Violations
The court held that there was enough evidence before the IJ and BIA to conclude that petitioner lacked the good moral character necessary for cancellation, and that the outcome of the latest criminal proceeding was immaterial. Bd. did not err … Continue reading
CA7 finds retroactive application of “sought to acquire” of CSPA would be a manifest injustice
The Child Status Protection Act, 8 U.S.C. 1153(h), allows adult children of lawful permanent residents to maintain child status if their parent filed a visa petition on their behalf while they were under 21 and prevents such children from aging … Continue reading
CA7 finds alien’s continuous presence in the United States ends upon the service of a Notice to Appear on the alien, even if that notice is missing the date and time of the initial hearing.
An alien otherwise inadmissible can be eligible for cancellation of removal if, among other things, he establishes that he “has been physically present in the United States for a continuous period of at least ten (10) years immediately preceding the … Continue reading