Survey of Illinois DUI Arrests 2008

  1. 2008 Top Cops – 100+ DUI Arrests
  2. 2008 TOP DEPARTMENTS 200+ ARRESTS
  3. 2008 Municipalities by Arrest Rate (200+ Arrests)

The Alliance Against Intoxicated Motorists released a 2008 survey of arrests in Illinos towns for DUI. Leading the survey was Rockford with 785. Naperville was second with 651. Carol Stream and Barrington led the suburban Chicago area in the number of DUI arrests per officer. Each town had 9.44 arrests per officer. The town of Roscoe, just outside of Rockford, led the entire State of Illinois with 13.15 arrests per officer. The top DUI arresting officer was Sangamon County Sheriff’s Deputy James McNamara with 247 arrests. Timothy Walker of the Chicago Police Department had 244 arrests. Mark Harwood of Waukegan, the suburban leader, made 187 arrests.

The Alliance Against Intoxicated Motorists (AAIM) is an independent non-profit organization founded in 1982 by families who had lost loved ones in drunk driving crashes. AAIM was Illinois’ first citizen action group dedicated to the fight against driving under the influence.

Posted in Illinois DUI lawyer | Leave a comment

Non-Citizens Deported Mostly for Nonviolent Offenses

Human Rights Watch issued a report that it says documents for the first time exactly which kinds of non-citizens were deported from the U.S. between 1997 and 2007, and for what types of crimes.

The report says that 72 percent of immigrants deported from the U.S. between 1997 and 2007 were for non-violent offenses. Many of those immigrants were in the U.S. legally.

It shows that some of the most common crimes for which people were deported were relatively minor offenses, such as marijuana and cocaine possession or traffic offenses. Among legal immigrants who were deported, 77 percent had been convicted for such nonviolent crimes. Many had lived in the country for years and were forced apart from close family members.

From an L.A. Times story:

Federal authorities repeatedly have said that their priority was to find and remove illegal immigrants with violent criminal histories, but the U.S. government’s stepped-up enforcement in recent years has led to the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants convicted of nonviolent crimes, according to a new study.

Nearly three-quarters of the roughly 897,000 immigrants deported between 1997 and 2007 after serving criminal sentences were convicted of nonviolent offenses and one-fifth were legal permanent residents, according to the study released Wednesday by Human Rights Watch.

“This explodes the myth that immigrants deported for crimes are invariably people here illegally who committed serious, violent crimes,” said David Fathi, director of the New York-based advocacy group’s U.S. program. “We know now the large majority are being deported for nonviolent, often quite minor crimes.”

Posted in Chicago Immigration Court, Deportation, Deportation for Drug Crimes, Removal hearing | Leave a comment

Immigration Marriage fraud, misuse of visas

Marriage Fraud: Marriage fraud has been prosecuted, inter alia, under 8 U.S.C. § 1325 and 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a). The Immigration Marriage Fraud Amendments Act of 1986 amended § 1325 by adding § 1325(c), which provides a penalty of five years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine for any “individual who knowingly enters into a marriage for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws.” Under 8 U.S.C. § 1151(b), “immediate relatives” of U.S. citizens, including spouses, who are otherwise qualified for admission as immigrants, must be admitted as such, without regard to other, ordinary numerical limitations. The typical fact pattern in marriage fraud cases is that a U.S. citizen and an alien get married. They fulfill all state law requirements such as medical tests, licensing, and a ceremony. But the U.S. citizen is paid to marry the alien in order to entitle the alien to obtain status as a permanent resident of the United States; the parties do not intend to live together as man and wife.

A legal issue arises where the parties tell the INS they are married, and they subjectively believe they are telling the truth because they have complied with state marriage requirements. The Supreme Court has ruled that the validity of their marriage under state law is immaterial to the issue of whether they defrauded INS. There have been situations where a bona fide marriage turns sour but the alien induces the U.S. citizen spouse to maintain the marriage as a ruse only as long as necessary for the alien to obtain status as a permanent resident alien. There is a line of cases holding that the viability of the marriage, if initially valid, is not a proper concern of the INS. United States v. Qaisi, 779 F.2d 346 (6th Cir. 1985); Dabaghian v. Civilleti, 607 F.2d 868 (9th Cir. 1979), and cases cited therein. However, the Immigration Marriage Fraud Amendments of 1986, 8 U.S.C. § 1186a, were designed, inter alia, to eliminate the Qaisi type loophole by establishing a two-year conditional status for alien spouses seeking permnt resident status, and requiring that an actual family unit still remain in existence at the end of the two year period.

The first paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) proscribes the forging,
counterfeiting, altering or falsely making of certain immigration
documents or their use, possession, or receipt. The second paragraph
proscribes the possession, or bringing into the United States of
plates or distinctive papers used for the printing of entry
documents. The third paragraph makes it a crime, when applying for
an entry document or admission into the United States, to personate
another or appear under a false name. The fourth paragraph makes it
a crime to give a false statement under oath in any document
required by the immigration laws or regulations.

The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act
(IIRIRA) amended subsection 1546(a) to provide for enhanced
penalties if the offense was committed to facilitate an act of
international terrorism or a drug trafficking crime.

Subsection 1546(b) makes it a felony offense to use a false
identification document, or misuses a real one, for the purpose of
satisfying the employment verification provisions in 8 U.S.C. §
1324a(b).

Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 1541 to 1546, provide criminal penalties for
offenses related to passports, visas, and related documents.
Sections 1541 to 1544 exclusively concern passports. Section 1545
deals with safe conducts as well as passports. 18 U.S.C. § 1546
deals with visas, permits, and related documents. See 3 A.L.R.Fed.
623.

A passport is defined at 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(30) as “any travel
document issued by competent authority showing the bearer’s origin,
identity, and nationality, if any, which is valid for the entry of
the bearer into a foreign country.” The Supreme Court has stated “[a
passport] is a document, which, from its nature and object, is
addressed to foreign powers; purporting only to be a request, that
the bearer of it may pass safely and freely; and is to be considered
rather in the character of a political document, by which the bearer
is recognized, in foreign countries, as an American citizen; and
which, by usage and the law of nations, is received as evidence of
the fact.” See Haig v. Agee, 453 U.S. 280, 292 (1981). Title 8
U.S.C. § 1104 entrusts control of passport and visa matters to the
Department of State, and establishes a Passport Office and a Visa
Office. Title 8 U.S.C. § 1185(b) makes it unlawful for a United
States citizen to attempt to depart from or enter the United States
without a valid passport, except as authorized by the President.

Section 211a of Title 22 authorizes the Secretary of State to issue
United States passports in foreign countries. Title 22 U.S.C. § 212
limits issuance of United States passports to United States
nationals only. Section 213 prescribes the method of applying for a
passport, Title 22 U.S.C. §§. 213, 214a, and 215 control the fees
for passports, 22 U.S.C. § 217a limits the temporal validity of
passports to no more than 10 years. State Department regulations
governing passports appear at 22 C.F.R. Part 51. See 59A Am.Jur.2d
“Passports” for a general discussion of the law of passports.

The statutory maximum term of imprisonment for violations of 18
U.S.C. §§ 1541 – 1546 is 10 years. See 18 U.S.C. § 3291. However, 18
U.S.C. § 1547 provides that notwithstanding any other provision of
title 18, the maximum term of imprisonment that may be imposed for
passport and visa violations (except violations under 18 U.S.C. §
1545) if committed to facilitate a drug trafficking crime is 15
years; and if committed to facilitate an act of international
terrorism is 20 years.

_________________________________________________________

§ 1546. Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents

(a) Whoever knowingly forges, counterfeits, alters, or falsely makes any immigrant or nonimmigrant visa, permit, border crossing card, alien registration receipt card, or other document prescribed by statute or regulation for entry into or as evidence of authorized stay or employment in the United States, or utters, uses, attempts to use, possesses, obtains, accepts, or receives any such visa, permit, border crossing card, alien registration receipt card, or other document prescribed by statute or regulation for entry into or as evidence of authorized stay or employment in the United States, knowing it to be forged, counterfeited, altered, or falsely made, or to have been procured by means of any false claim or statement, or to have been otherwise procured by fraud or unlawfully obtained; or

Whoever, except under direction of the Attorney General or the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, or other proper officer, knowingly possesses any blank permit, or engraves, sells, brings into the United States, or has in his control or possession any plate in the likeness of a plate designed for the printing of permits, or makes any print, photograph, or impression in the likeness of any immigrant or nonimmigrant visa, permit or other document required for entry into the United States, or has in his possession a distinctive paper which has been adopted by the Attorney General or the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service for the printing of such visas, permits, or documents; or

Whoever, when applying for an immigrant or nonimmigrant visa, permit, or other document required for entry into the United States, or for admission to the United States personates another, or falsely appears in the name of a deceased individual, or evades or attempts to evade the immigration laws by appearing under an assumed or fictitious name without disclosing his true identity, or sells or otherwise disposes of, or offers to sell or otherwise dispose of, or utters, such visa, permit, or other document, to any person not authorized by law to receive such document; or

Whoever knowingly makes under oath, or as permitted under penalty of perjury under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, knowingly subscribes as true, any false statement with respect to a material fact in any application, affidavit, or other document required by the immigration laws or regulations prescribed thereunder, or knowingly presents any such application, affidavit, or other document which contains any such false statement or which fails to contain any reasonable basis in law or fact—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 25 years (if the offense was committed to facilitate an act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331 of this title)), 20 years (if the offense was committed to facilitate a drug trafficking crime (as defined in section 929 (a) of this title)), 10 years (in the case of the first or second such offense, if the offense was not committed to facilitate such an act of international terrorism or a drug trafficking crime), or 15 years (in the case of any other offense), or both.

(b) Whoever uses—

(1) an identification document, knowing (or having reason to know) that the document was not issued lawfully for the use of the possessor,

(2) an identification document knowing (or having reason to know) that the document is false, or

(3) a false attestation, for the purpose of satisfying a requirement of section 274A(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(c) This section does not prohibit any lawfully authorized investigative, protective, or intelligence activity of a law enforcement agency of the United States, a State, or a subdivision of a State, or of an intelligence agency of the United States, or any activity authorized under title V of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (18 U.S.C. note prec. 3481).[1] For purposes of this section, the term “State” means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.

§ 1325. Improper entry by alien

(a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of facts

Any alien who

(1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or

(2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or

(3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.

(b) Improper time or place; civil penalties
Any alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to enter) the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty of—

(1) at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or attempted entry); or

(2) twice the amount specified in paragraph (1) in the case of an alien who has been previously subject to a civil penalty under this subsection.

Civil penalties under this subsection are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any criminal or other civil penalties that may be imposed.

(c) Marriage fraud
Any individual who knowingly enters into a marriage for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or fined not more than $250,000, or both.

(d) Immigration-related entrepreneurship fraud
Any individual who knowingly establishes a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading any provision of the immigration laws shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years, fined in accordance with title 18, or both.

595 F.2d 1192
_____________________________
Sec. 3291. Nationality, citizenship and passports

No person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for violation
of any provision of sections 1423 to 1428, inclusive, of chapter 69
and sections 1541 to 1544, inclusive, of chapter 75 of title 18 of
the United States Code, or for conspiracy to violate any of such
sections, unless the indictment is found or the information is
instituted within ten years after the commission of the offense.

CHAPTER 213–LIMITATIONS

18 U.S.C. § 3282 Offenses not capital

Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, no person shall be
prosecuted, tried, or punished for any offense, not capital, unless the
indictment is found or the information is instituted within five years
next after such offense shall have been committed.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 828; Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1214,
Sec. 12(a), formerly Sec. 10(a), 68 Stat. 1145; renumbered Pub. L. 87-
299, Sec. 1, Sept. 26, 1961, 75 Stat. 648.)
_________________________________

Posted in Deportation, Immigration Marriage Fraud Amendments Act of 1986 | Leave a comment

I-9 Documents Acceptable for Employment Eligibility Verification

All U.S. employers are responsible for completion and retention of Form I-9 for each individual they hire for employment in the United States. This includes citizens and noncitizens. On the form, the employer must verify the employment eligibility and identity documents presented by the employee and record the document information on the Form I-9. The list of acceptable documents can be found on the last page of the form.

Do not file Form I-9 with U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or USCIS. Form I-9 must be kept by the employer either for three years after the date of hire or for one year after employment is terminated, whichever is later. The form must be available for inspection by authorized U.S. Government officials (e.g., Department of Homeland Security, Department of Labor, Office of Special Counsel).

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it has delayed by 60 days, until April 3, 2009, the implementation of an interim final rule entitled “Documents Acceptable for Employment Eligibility Verification” published in the Federal Register on December 17, 2008. The rule streamlines the Employment Eligibility Verification (Form I-9) process. The delay is intended to provide the government with an opportunity for further consideration of the rule and also allows the public additional time to submit comments. A notice announcing this delay has been transmitted to the Federal Register and is scheduled for publication on February 3, 2009. In addition, USCIS has reopened the public comment period (which was to end on February 2, 2009) for 30 days until March 4, 2009.

* Download I-9 (Rev. 06/05/07 N – only for use BEFORE April 3, 2009) (408KB PDF)
* Download I-9 (REV. 02/02/09 N – Only for use On and AFTER April 3, 2009) (444KB PDF)
* Download I-9 (Revisado en 6/5/07 N – para utilizarse sólo ANTES del 3 de abril de 2009) (818KB PDF)
* Download I-9 (Revisado en 02/02/09 N – para utilizarse sólo EN y después del 3 de abril de 2009) (443KB PDF)

Employers must complete a Form I-9 for all newly hired employees to verify their identity and authorization to work in the U.S. The interim final rule will amend regulations governing the types of acceptable identity and employment authorization documents that employees may present to their employers for completion of the Form I-9. Under the interim rule, employers will no longer be able to accept expired documents to verify employment authorization on the Form I-9.
___________________

USCIS Publishes Interim Final I-9 Rule; New I-9 Form
The interim final rule streamlining the employment eligibility verification (Form I-9) process that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), announced it submitted to the Federal Register on December 12, 2008, has now been published in the Federal Register along with a copy of the proposed new I-9 form at 73 Fed. Reg. 76505 (Dec. 17, 2008).

The interim final rule amends 8 CFR § 274a.2 to change the term “eligibility” to “authorization” and, in subsection (b)(1)(v), narrows the list of acceptable identity documents and specifies that expired documents are not considered acceptable forms of identification.

Employers must complete a Form I-9 for all newly hired employees to verify their identity and authorization to work in the U.S. The list of approved documents that employees can present to verify their identity and employment authorization is divided into three sections: List A (8 CFR § 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(A)) documents verify identity and employment authorization, List B (8 CFR § 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(B)) documents verify identity only, and List C (8 CFR § 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(C)) documents verify employment authorization only. The interim final rule removes the terms “unexpired” and “expired” from those documents currently listed in the regulations. Rather than modify each acceptable document with the term “unexpired,” the rule imposes a general requirement that all documents must be unexpired. USCIS invites comments on whether this prohibition on the use of expired documents for the Form I-9 should be modified to permit employers to accept List B identity documents that have expired within the last 90 days (or other limited time period) of the date when they are presented to the employer for the Form I-9.

In 8 CFR § 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(A)(3), the rule modifies the reference to temporary I-551 stamps on unexpired foreign passports to include pre-printed temporary I-551 notation on machine-readable immigrant visas (MRIVs); however, since the pre-printed notation is not included on Form I-94s, the rule does not make any changes to regulatory references to temporary I-551 stamps on Form I-94s.

The interim final rule eliminates Forms I-688, I-688A, and I-688B (temporary resident card and older versions of the employment authorization card/document) from List A, new 8 CFR § 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(A). USCIS no longer issues these cards, and all that were in circulation have expired. The rule also adds to List A of the Form I-9 in 8 CFR § 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(A) foreign passports containing specially-marked machine-readable visas and documentation for certain citizens of the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) and the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI).

In addition, the rule updates the list of acceptable documents and receipts by including “Form I-94A” next to each reference to the Form I-94, Arrival-Departure Record, new 8 CFR § 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(A)(5) and (b)(1)(vi)(B) and (C). The Form I-94A is nearly identical to the Form I-94 except that all fields are computer-generated rather than being annotated by hand.

The rule replaces the current reference to the List C document “Social Security number card” with the statutory term “Social Security account number card” and revises the restrictions in the acceptability of social security account number cards to track the statutory language, new 8 CFR § 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(C)(1). The rule also corrects the incorrect reference to Forms FS-545 and DS-1350 as “Certification of Birth Aboard” to reflect that the FS-545 is correctly titled “Certification of Birth” and the DS-1350 is correctly titled “Certification of Report of Birth,” 8 CFR § 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(C)(2) and (3). Additionally, the rule replaces references to the former INS with “DHS.”

In implementing the regulatory changes being made by this rule, DHS is also revising the Form I-9 itself. Changes to the Form I-9, in addition to revisions to the list of acceptable documents, include:

• in Section 1, making “citizen of the United States” and “noncitizen national of the United States, as defined in 8 U.S.C. 1408” two separate categories in the employee attestation part of the form

• in Section 1, replacing “An alien authorized to work until __/__/__ (Alien # or Admission _____” with “An alien authorized to work (A# or Admission #_____) until (expiration date, if applicable–month/day/year)__/__/__”

• in the form instructions, including a paragraph that clarifies when employers need to reverify certain employees to read as follows: “Note that some employees may leave the expiration date blank if they are aliens whose work authorization does not expire (e.g., asylees, refugees, certain citizens of the Federated States of Micronesia or the Republic of the Marshall Islands). For such employees, reverification does not apply unless they choose to present in Section 2 evidence of employment authorization that contains an expiration date (e.g., Employment Authorization Document (Form I-766)).”

The revised Form I-9 includes additional changes, such as revisions to the employee attestation section and the addition of the new U.S. passport card to List A.

Employers will have to use the revised Form I-9 for all new hires and to reverify any employee with expiring employment authorization beginning 45 days after publication in the Federal Register. The current version of the Form I-9 (dated June 5, 2007) will no longer be valid after that date.

The interim final rule is effective February 2, 2009. Written comments must reference Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Docket No. USCIS-2008-0001 and must be submitted on or before February 2, 2009, by:

• using the federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov

• mailing paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions to Chief, Regulatory Management Division, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 111 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Suite 3008, Washington, DC 20529-2210

• using hand delivery/courier to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, 111 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Suite 3008, Washington, DC 20529-2210; contact phone number: (202) 272-8377

Currently, the first box in that section states: ‘’A citizen or national of the United States.’‘ USCIS states that separating those two groups will eliminate one difficulty that currently exists when prosecuting those who make false claims to U.S. citizenship. USCIS explains that noncitizen nationals of the U.S. are persons born in American Samoa as provided in INA § 308 [8 USCA § 1408]; certain former citizens of the former Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands who relinquished their U.S. citizenship acquired under INA § 301 of Pub. L. No. 94-241 (establishing the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands) by executing a declaration before an appropriate court that they intended to be noncitizen nationals rather than U.S. citizens; and certain children of noncitizen nationals born abroad, as provided by INA § 308. A definition of noncitizen national is added to the instructions to the Form I-9.

_________________________________________________
Revised Form I-9

Form I-9. The revised edition of Form I-9 is dated February 2, 2009, and must be used beginning on that date; the June 5, 2007 version of the form should be used until that time. Both versions of the form are available on USCIS’ website.

This revised Form I-9 reflects the changes made by the interim final rule to streamline the employment eligibility verification (Form I-9) process, including the types of acceptable identity and employment authorization documents and receipts that employees may present to their employers for completion of the Form I-9. The following modifications to the form and its instructions supplement that discussion:

• “eligible” has been changed to “authorized” throughout the form and its instructions

• on page 1 of the instructions under the heading “Section 1, Employee,” USCIS has noted that, instead of being completed at the time of hire, this part of the form must be completed no later than the time of hire

• also on page 1 of the instructions, USCIS has added a paragraph concerning noncitizen nationals of the U.S.

• under the “Section 2, Employer,” heading on page 1 of the instructions, the agency has noted that (1) employers “cannot specify which document(s) listed on the last page of Form I-9 employees present to establish identity and employment authorization” as “[e]mployees may present any List A document OR a combination of a List B and a List C document”; (2) “receipts showing that a person has applied for an initial grant of employment authorization, or for renewal of employment authorization, are not acceptable” and (3) if photocopies of original documents presented by the employee are made, they must be made for all new hires

• at the top of page 2 of the instructions, a reference to the USCIS Handbook for Employers (Form M-274) has been included as a source for more information

• under the heading “Section 3, Updating and Reverification” on page 2 of the instructions, a note has been added that employers have the option of completing a new Form I-9 instead of section 3 for reverification purposes

• in the USCIS Forms and Information section of the instructions on page 2, USCIS has added its website address and the phone number 1-888-464-2418 as a reference for information about Form I-9 and E-Verify

Posted in Documents Acceptable for Employment Eligibility Verification, Employment Eligibility Verification, I-9 | Leave a comment

Direct Filing N-400 Application for Naturalization

The Direct Mail Program for Form N-400, Application for Naturalization, took effect on January 22, 2009. As of that date, all nonmilitary applicants must submit Form N-400, and any related supplements, to one of two lockbox addresses, based on where the applicant resides. N-400s will be processed by the National Benefits Center, which will complete national security checks, conduct various processing steps, and maintain applicant files waiting for adjudicative interview by USCIS field offices. Previously these tasks were performed by the USCIS service centers.

Applicants who reside in: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Territory of Guam, or the Northern Mariana Islands must submit Form N-400 to:

U.S. Postal Service Address:
USCIS Lockbox Facility, USCIS
P.O. Box 21251
Phoenix, AZ 85036

Private Courier (non-USPS) Address:
USCIS, Attn: N400
1820 E Skyharbor Circle
S. Floor 1, Phoenix, AZ 85036

Applicants who reside in: Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, DC, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, or the U.S. Virgin Islands must submit Form N-400 to:

U.S. Postal Service Address:
USCIS Lockbox Facility, USCIS
P.O. Box 299026
Lewisville, TX 75029

Private Courier (non-USPS) Address:
USCIS, Attn: N400
2501 S. State Hwy 121, Bldg. 4
Lewisville, TX 75067.

USCIS will only forward incorrectly filed N-400s to the correct location for 30 days after the effective date of the change. After this 30-day period, the agency will reject cases that are not filed according to the new policy.

Posted in Application for Naturalization, Citizenship, Direct Filing N-400, Eligibility for Naturalization, Good Moral Character, N-400 application, Naturalization Interview Process | Leave a comment