Phone: 312-714-2800
-
Recent Posts
- Administrative Closure Explained: When Detention Means No Pause June 7, 2025
- Trump’s 2025 travel ban is back—overbroad, underinclusive, and unnecessary, but likely to survive in court as a policy spectacle, just like before. June 6, 2025
- Who Must Register Under the 1940 Alien Registration Law? | 2025 Immigration Compliance Guide May 31, 2025
- When Paperwork Errors Don’t End Cases: The New Rules for Defective NTAs After Lopez-Ticas May 29, 2025
- Court Says No: How the President’s Tariff Powers Were Put in Check May 28, 2025
Archives
Categories
RSS Feed
Links
- CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD)
- Law Offices of Michael D. Baker
-
Category Archives: Padilla v. Kentucky
CA7 holds that misadvice and failure to advise does not evade the non‐retroactivity of Padilla
Chavarria, born in Mexico, became a legal permanent U.S. resident in 1982. In 2009, Chavarria pleaded guilty to distributing cocaine. One year later, the Supreme Court decided Padilla v. Kentucky, imposing a duty on defense attorneys to inform noncitizen clients … Continue reading
Padilla v. Kentucky does not apply retroactively to cases already final on direct review
In Chaidez v. United States, the Court held that Padilla v. Kentucky, in which the Court held that the Sixth Amendment requires defense attorneys to inform criminal defendants of the deportation risks of guilty pleas, does not apply retroactively to cases already … Continue reading
Padilla v. Kentucky Reference Guide
Office of Immigration Litigation – Appellate SectionOffice of Immigration Litigation Issues Reference Guide to ImmigrationTweet http://www.justice.gov/civil/oil/OIL_Padilla_Reference_Guide.pdf Consequences of Crimes in Response to Supreme Court Decision in Padilla v. Kentucky. In view of the Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v. Kentucky, … Continue reading
Padilla applied retroactively to conviction which became final before March 31, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. ROSELVA CHAIDEZ, Defendant/Petitioner. No. 03 CR 636-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81860 August 11, 2010, Decided August 11, 2010, Filed PRIOR HISTORY: … Continue reading
Criminal Defense Counsel has a Sixth Amendment obligation to inform a defendant about immigration consequences or to advise when consequences are clear
The first step has been taken to equate deportation with “punishment”. If “deportation is an integral part—indeed, sometimes the most important part — of the penalty that may be imposed on noncitizen defendants who plead guilty to specified crimes” then, … Continue reading