Category Archives: Padilla v. Kentucky

CA7 holds that misadvice and failure to advise does not evade the non‐retroactivity of Padilla

Chavarria, born in Mexico, became a legal permanent U.S. resident in 1982. In 2009, Chavarria pleaded guilty to distributing cocaine. One year later, the Supreme Court decided Padilla v. Kentucky, imposing a duty on defense attorneys to inform noncitizen clients … Continue reading

Posted in 7th Circuit, 7th Circuit Cases- Aliens, Chicago Immigration Court, ineffective assistance of counsel, Padilla, Padilla v. Kentucky | Leave a comment

Padilla v. Kentucky does not apply retroactively to cases already final on direct review

In Chaidez v. United States, the Court held that Padilla v. Kentucky, in which the Court held that the Sixth Amendment requires defense attorneys to inform criminal defendants of the deportation risks of guilty pleas, does not apply retroactively to cases already … Continue reading

Posted in Guilty Pleas, ineffective assistance of counsel, Padilla, Padilla v. Kentucky, U.S. Supreme Court | Tagged | Leave a comment

Padilla v. Kentucky Reference Guide

Office of Immigration Litigation – Appellate SectionOffice of Immigration Litigation Issues Reference Guide to ImmigrationTweet http://www.justice.gov/civil/oil/OIL_Padilla_Reference_Guide.pdf Consequences of Crimes in Response to Supreme Court Decision in Padilla v. Kentucky. In view of the Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v. Kentucky, … Continue reading

Posted in ineffective assistance of counsel, Padilla, Padilla v. Kentucky | 1 Comment

Padilla applied retroactively to conviction which became final before March 31, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. ROSELVA CHAIDEZ, Defendant/Petitioner.  No. 03 CR 636-6  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION  2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81860  August 11, 2010, Decided August 11, 2010, Filed  PRIOR HISTORY: … Continue reading

Posted in ineffective assistance of counsel, Padilla, Padilla v. Kentucky, Retiractivity | Leave a comment

Criminal Defense Counsel has a Sixth Amendment obligation to inform a defendant about immigration consequences or to advise when consequences are clear

The first step has been taken to equate deportation with “punishment”. If “deportation is an integral part—indeed, sometimes the most important part — of the penalty that may be imposed on noncitizen defendants who plead guilty to specified crimes” then, … Continue reading

Posted in ineffective assistance of counsel, Padilla, Padilla v. Kentucky | 2 Comments