Phone: 312-714-2800
-
Recent Posts
- Matter of O-Y-A-E- (BIA 2025): BIA Clarifies Convention Against Torture Standard—Old Threats Alone Are Not Enough August 23, 2025
- Soft Secession vs. Soft Fascism: How States Quietly Resist Federal Overreach August 22, 2025
- Cancellation of Removal: Understanding Deportation Relief for Non-Permanent Residents August 21, 2025
- With Chevron Gone: Timeline of Mandatory Detention and Rising Judicial Review in U.S. Immigration August 19, 2025
- Matter of G-C-I-: The BIA Just Rewrote the Rules for Credibility and Corroboration August 19, 2025
Archives
Categories
RSS Feed
Links
- CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD)
- Law Offices of Michael D. Baker
-
Category Archives: Motion for Continuance
Motion to reopen must be filed within 90 days of the dismissal of the Board appeal, regardless of the pendency of a motion to reconsider the removal order.
Doc Uploaded Filed Description 1 04/25/2012 04/25/2012 Oral Argument 2 05/21/2012 05/21/2012 Opinion (TINDER) Leonida M. SARMIENTO and Romeo L. Sarmiento, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. No. 11–2841. Argued April 25, 2012. … Continue reading
Calma v. Holder & Khomyshyn v. Holder. Motion for Continuance. U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
The petitioners in consolidated cases have been in the U.S. for many years without permission, and each would like to adjust his status to that of lawful permanent resident through relatives who are legitimately in the U.S. The IJ found … Continue reading
Posted in 7th Circuit, 7th Circuit Cases- Aliens, Jurisdiction, Motion for Continuance
Tagged Continue
3 Comments