Category Archives: ineffective assistance of counsel

Padilla applied retroactively to conviction which became final before March 31, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. ROSELVA CHAIDEZ, Defendant/Petitioner.  No. 03 CR 636-6  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION  2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81860  August 11, 2010, Decided August 11, 2010, Filed  PRIOR HISTORY: … Continue reading

Posted in ineffective assistance of counsel, Padilla, Padilla v. Kentucky, Retiractivity | Leave a comment

Padilla & prosecutors duty

Defense counsel should be aware that prosecutors also have a responsibility to consider deportation and other so-called “collateral” consequences in plea negotiations. Prosecutors are not charged merely with the obligation to seek the maximum punishment in all cases, but with … Continue reading

Posted in ineffective assistance of counsel, Padilla | 1 Comment

Padilla v. Kentucky and the Immigration Consequences of Crimes

On March 31, 2010, in a landmark decision called Padilla v. Kentucky, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment requires criminal defense counsel to advise a noncitizen defendant regarding the immigration consequences of a guilty plea, and that … Continue reading

Posted in ineffective assistance of counsel, U.S. Supreme Court | Leave a comment

Criminal Defense Counsel has a Sixth Amendment obligation to inform a defendant about immigration consequences or to advise when consequences are clear

The first step has been taken to equate deportation with “punishment”. If “deportation is an integral part—indeed, sometimes the most important part — of the penalty that may be imposed on noncitizen defendants who plead guilty to specified crimes” then, … Continue reading

Posted in ineffective assistance of counsel, Padilla, Padilla v. Kentucky | 2 Comments

Defendants Get Enough Warning About a Guilty Plea’s Consequences? 6th A. requires defense lawyers to advise on Immigration Consequences?

Padilla v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Padilla v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: Interpreting Strickland’s Applicability to Misadvice Regarding Immigration Consequences (Argument Recap)”>Padilla v. Commonwealth of Kentucky: Interpreting Strickland’s Applicability to Misadvice Regarding Immigration Consequences (Argument Recap) Does the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of … Continue reading

Posted in ineffective assistance of counsel, vacate plea | 5 Comments