Phone: 312-714-2800
July 2025 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 -
Recent Posts
- Denaturalization Under the Trump Administration: Legal Standards, Constitutional Constraints, and DOJ Enforcement Priorities July 2, 2025
- Administrative Closure Explained: When Detention Means No Pause June 7, 2025
- Trump’s 2025 travel ban is back—overbroad, underinclusive, and unnecessary, but likely to survive in court as a policy spectacle, just like before. June 6, 2025
- Who Must Register Under the 1940 Alien Registration Law? | 2025 Immigration Compliance Guide May 31, 2025
- When Paperwork Errors Don’t End Cases: The New Rules for Defective NTAs After Lopez-Ticas May 29, 2025
Archives
Categories
RSS Feed
Links
- CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD)
- Law Offices of Michael D. Baker
-
Category Archives: Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 26 (2012-2017) Executive Office for Immigration Review
BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 25 (3643 – 3765) BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 26 (2012-2017 (3766-3886) Executive Office for Immigration Review BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 27 (Volume 27 (3887-2017-) Executive Office for Immigration Review FLORES-ABARCA, 26 I&N Dec. 992 (BIA 2017) … Continue reading
Posted in 26 I&N Dec. 415 (BIA 2014), BIA, BIA Precedent Decisions, BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 25, BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 26, BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 26 (2012-2017), BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 27 (2017-) Executive Office for Immigration Review, BIA PRECEDENT TABLE, BIA Precedent Table-1995 to Present, Board of Immigration Appeals, Executive Office for Immigration Review
Tagged BIA Precedent Decisions
Leave a comment
CA7 upholds BIA denial of untimely Motion to Reopen based on ineffective counsel
YUSEV v. Sessions, Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit 2017 Bd. did not err in denying alien’s motion to reopen their applications for asylum and withholding of removal based on claim that their counsel was ineffective. Said motion was untimely, since … Continue reading
LPR Returning to U.S. Cannot Be Regarded as Seeking Admission and May Not Be Charged with Inadmissibility
Distinguishing Koloamatangi, the BIA holds that LPR returning to U.S. is not seeking an admission and may not be charged with inadmissibility under 8 USCA § 1182(a). In Matter of Pena, 26 I. & N. Dec. 613 (B.I.A. June 16, … Continue reading
Three USCIS Administrative Appeals Office Decisions Published
Matter of Leacheng International, Inc. (1) The definition of “doing business” at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(j)(2) (2014) contains no requirement that a petitioner for a multinational manager or executive must provide goods and or services to an unaffiliated third party. … Continue reading
BIA reasserts the circumstance-specific inquiry on the phrase “a single offense involving possession for one’s own use of thirty grams or less of marijuana”
Matter of Jonet DOMINGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Respondent 26 I&N Dec. 408 (BIA 2014) Interim Decision #3814 Decided September 18, 2014 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeal For purposes of section 237(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Immigration and … Continue reading
Posted in "possession for personal use”, a single offense involving possession for one’s own use of thirty grams or less of marijuana, BIA, BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 25, Board of Immigration Appeals, categorical approach, Deportation for Drug Crimes, Modified categorical approach, single offense
Leave a comment