Phone: 312-714-2800
December 2024 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 -
Recent Posts
- Immigration backlogs August 2, 2023
- Expunging, sealing criminal records, Illinois January 5, 2023
- Relief Application Waived if Not Filed by IJ’s Deadline, BIA Rules September 11, 2020
- BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 27 (3887 – 3984) Executive Office for Immigration Review 2017-2020 September 11, 2020
- CA7 finds that a deficient immigration court notice does not strip the immigration courts of authority to preside over the resulting removal proceedings May 22, 2019
Archives
Categories
RSS Feed
Links
Tweets
- Former teacher sentenced to 36 years in prison for child sexual exploitation after HSI Chicago-led investigation vi… https://t.co/KosmBAphVr 2 years
- Florida federal judge's border decision 'very harmful,' Mayorkas says - POLITICO https://t.co/J1t37ZhcYX 2 years
- New ICE program will put families under home curfew, deport those who fail asylum screenings - Los Angeles Times https://t.co/ENy1wj5nqH 2 years
- A Post-Title 42 US/Mexico Border https://t.co/XxEKPR1szC 2 years
- Immigration Article of the Day: Forced Back into the Lion's Mouth: Per Se Reporting Requirements in U.S. Asylum Law… https://t.co/tLhgEZdnNN 2 years
- From the Bookshelves: Green Card Soldier by Sofya Aptekar https://t.co/Fe9Fnk0MV5 2 years
-
Category Archives: Board of Immigration Appeals
CA7 upholds BIA denial of untimely Motion to Reopen based on ineffective counsel
YUSEV v. Sessions, Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit 2017 Bd. did not err in denying alien’s motion to reopen their applications for asylum and withholding of removal based on claim that their counsel was ineffective. Said motion was untimely, since … Continue reading
LPR Returning to U.S. Cannot Be Regarded as Seeking Admission and May Not Be Charged with Inadmissibility
Distinguishing Koloamatangi, the BIA holds that LPR returning to U.S. is not seeking an admission and may not be charged with inadmissibility under 8 USCA § 1182(a). In Matter of Pena, 26 I. & N. Dec. 613 (B.I.A. June 16, … Continue reading
Three USCIS Administrative Appeals Office Decisions Published
Matter of Leacheng International, Inc. (1) The definition of “doing business” at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(j)(2) (2014) contains no requirement that a petitioner for a multinational manager or executive must provide goods and or services to an unaffiliated third party. … Continue reading
BIA reasserts the circumstance-specific inquiry on the phrase “a single offense involving possession for one’s own use of thirty grams or less of marijuana”
Matter of Jonet DOMINGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Respondent 26 I&N Dec. 408 (BIA 2014) Interim Decision #3814 Decided September 18, 2014 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeal For purposes of section 237(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Immigration and … Continue reading
Posted in "possession for personal use”, a single offense involving possession for one’s own use of thirty grams or less of marijuana, BIA, BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 25, Board of Immigration Appeals, categorical approach, Deportation for Drug Crimes, Modified categorical approach, single offense
Leave a comment
BIA Precedent Table-1995 to Present
Headnotes from BIA precedent cases published in volumes 21,22, 23, 24, 25 and 26 of the Administrative Decisions under the Immigration and Nationality Laws of the United States, organized by topic. As such, it includes all BIA cases published from … Continue reading