Phone: 312-714-2800
-
Recent Posts
- Administrative Closure Explained: When Detention Means No Pause June 7, 2025
- Trump’s 2025 travel ban is back—overbroad, underinclusive, and unnecessary, but likely to survive in court as a policy spectacle, just like before. June 6, 2025
- Who Must Register Under the 1940 Alien Registration Law? | 2025 Immigration Compliance Guide May 31, 2025
- When Paperwork Errors Don’t End Cases: The New Rules for Defective NTAs After Lopez-Ticas May 29, 2025
- Court Says No: How the President’s Tariff Powers Were Put in Check May 28, 2025
Archives
Categories
RSS Feed
Links
- CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD)
- Law Offices of Michael D. Baker
-
Category Archives: 7th Circuit
Motion to terminate removal proceeding, Sham marriage No. 08-1512. SURGANOVA v. HOLDER US 7th Circuit
In a petition for review of the BIA’s order denying petitioner’s motion to terminate her removal proceedings and concluding that she was removable because her marriage was a sham, the petition is denied where: 1) the account she presented bore … Continue reading
Chinese Asylum: Is it appropriate to treat suing a unit of government as a legitimate means of expressing one’s political opinion? 7th Circuit 2010
Xiu Chen v. Eric Holder, Jr. (Easterbrook)Full Text A Chinese citizen’s petition for review of BIA’s denial of her application for asylum is granted and remanded as the Board has never addressed the question of whether it is appropriate to … Continue reading
Posted in 7th Circuit, 7th Circuit Cases- Aliens, Asylum
Leave a comment
Establishing good cause for a continuance of proceedings-7th Cir. 2010
Juarez v. Holder, No. 08-1788: Denial of Motion to Reopen/Noncompliance with Biometrics Requirements Juarez v. Holder (Sykes) Oral Argument | Full Text Petition for review BIA’s decision that petitioners’ untimely applications and failure to provide the required biometrics meant they had … Continue reading
Motion to Reopen After Departure from U.S./Sua Sponte Authority to Consider Belated Motions
CA7 affirmed denial of motion to reopen by departed alien, finding that petitioner’s motion was unquestionably time-barred where petitioner offered no basis to excuse a six-plus year delay in moving to reopen. (Munoz de Real v. Holder, 2/11/10). A petition … Continue reading
U.S. Supreme Court ruling preserves the right to judicial review for immigrants facing deportation.
HELD: Section 1252(a)(2)(B)’s proscription of judicial review applies only to Attorney General determinations made discretionary by statute, not to determinations declared discretionary by the Attorney General himself through regulation. Kucana v. Holder (PDF)(a) The motion to reopen is an “important … Continue reading