Phone: 312-714-2800
-
Recent Posts
- Effects of Removal (Deportation) on Retirement or Disability Beneficiaries August 15, 2025
- H-2A vs H-2B Visa Programs: 2025 Guide for US Employers August 12, 2025
- Immigration Justice in the Age of AI: Key Federal Guidance, Policies, and Court Insights — August 2025 August 11, 2025
- How the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” Targets Immigrant Health, Families, and DACA Recipients August 3, 2025
- Biden, the Border, and the Facts: David J. Bier’s In-Depth Analysis of America’s Migration Surge August 3, 2025
Archives
Categories
RSS Feed
Links
- CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD)
- Law Offices of Michael D. Baker
-
Category Archives: 7th Circuit Cases- Aliens
CA7 Holds Aggravated Felony Definition Does Not Apply to Pre-1988 Convictions: Zivkovic v. Holder
Zivkovic, a Serbian, was admitted to the U.S. as a lawful permanent resident in 1966. In 1976, he pleaded guilty to burglary and received a sentence of two to six years. In 1978, he was convicted of attempted rape and … Continue reading
CA7 remands Chinese asylum case to BIA, Zheng v. Holder
There is no sound basis . . . to resolve Zheng’s petition for review differently from the petitions for review in Ni and Chen. “The INS must give each asylum case individualized scrutiny, but it is a foundation of the … Continue reading
Posted in 7th Circuit, 7th Circuit Cases- Aliens, Asylum, changed circumstances, changed country conditions, China one-child policy, China’s family planning policy, forced sterilization, Fujian Province, one-child policy, past persecution, People’s Republic of China, political asylum, well-founded fear of future persecution
Leave a comment
CA7 Overrules BIA in Matter of Akram, K-4 nonimmigrant may adjust status “as a result of the marriage of” parents.
CA7 Overrules BIA in Matter of Akram: Section 1255(d) does not require K4s to adjust status by way of their petitioning stepparent. Instead, it merely requires them to adjust status “as a result of the marriage of” their parents. An … Continue reading
Indian Sikh experienced past persecution but possibility of relocation established no future fear
Singh v. Holder (7th Circuit, June 21, 2013) Bikram Singh, an Indian national, sought asylum in the United States based on his affiliation with the Sikh religion. He was thrice detained by Indian authorities. While detained, he was beaten severely, … Continue reading
CA7 finds religious persecution in China, June 2013
Shu Liu v. Holder, Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit 2013 The petitioner, a Chinese citizen, entered the U.S. in 2001, at the age of 18, and applied for asylum on the ground that if returned to China she would be … Continue reading
Posted in 7th Circuit, 7th Circuit Cases- Aliens, changed circumstances, changed country conditions, Chinese officials persecute members of house churches, Motion to Reopen, Motions to Reopen, persecution on account of political opinion, religious freedom in China, religious persecution in China, well-founded fear of future persecution, well-founded fear of religious persecution
Tagged religious persecution in China
Leave a comment