Three USCIS Administrative Appeals Office Decisions Published

Matter of Leacheng International, Inc.

(1) The definition of “doing business” at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(j)(2) (2014) contains no requirement that a petitioner for a multinational manager or executive must provide goods and or services to an unaffiliated third party.

(2) A petitioner may establish that it is “doing business” by demonstrating that it is providing goods and/or services in a regular, systematic, and continuous manner to related companies within its multinational organization.

The link to this decision: http://www.justice.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/vol26/3830.pdf
_________________________________________________________________
Matter of Christo’s, Inc.

(1) An alien who submits false documents representing a nonexistent or fictitious marriage, but who never either entered into or attempted or conspired to enter into a marriage, may intend to evade the immigration laws but is not, by such act alone, considered to have “entered into” or “attempted or conspired to enter into” a marriage for purposes of section 204(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1154(c) (2012). Matter of Concepcion, 16 I&N Dec. 10 (BIA 1976), followed.

(2) Misrepresentations relating to a nonexistent marriage may render the beneficiary inadmissible under section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(i) (2012), when the Director adjudicates the application for adjustment of status.

The link to this decision: http://www.justice.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/vol26/3831.pdf
_________________________________________________________________
Matter of Simeio Solutions, LLC

(1) A change in the place of employment of a beneficiary to a geographical area requiring a corresponding Labor Condition Application for Nonimmigrant Workers (“LCA”) be certified to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security with respect to that beneficiary may affect eligibility for H-1B status; it is therefore a material change for purposes of 8 C.F.R. §§ 214.2(h)(2)(i)(E) and (11)(i)(A) (2014).

(2) When there is a material change in the terms and conditions of employment, the petitioner must file an amended or new H−1B petition with the corresponding LCA.

The link to this decision: http://www.justice.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/vol26/3832.pdf

Administrative Appeals Office

This entry was posted in AAO, AAO Practice Manual, AAO/Commissioner Decisions, Administrative Appeals Office, BIA Precedent Decisions Volume 26, Board of Immigration Appeals. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.