Phone: 312-714-2800
-
Recent Posts
- Administrative Closure Explained: When Detention Means No Pause June 7, 2025
- Trump’s 2025 travel ban is back—overbroad, underinclusive, and unnecessary, but likely to survive in court as a policy spectacle, just like before. June 6, 2025
- Who Must Register Under the 1940 Alien Registration Law? | 2025 Immigration Compliance Guide May 31, 2025
- When Paperwork Errors Don’t End Cases: The New Rules for Defective NTAs After Lopez-Ticas May 29, 2025
- Court Says No: How the President’s Tariff Powers Were Put in Check May 28, 2025
Archives
Categories
RSS Feed
Links
- CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD)
- Law Offices of Michael D. Baker
-
Daily Archives: July 24, 2011
ICE Memo on Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion Consistent with the Civil Immigration Enforcement Priorities
Memorandum by Director John Morton issuing guidance to ICE personnel on the exercise of prosecutorial discretion. The memo also sets forth which agency employees may exercise prosecutorial discretion and what factors should be considered. ICE 6/17/11 Here is a June … Continue reading
Posted in Prosecutorial discretion
Leave a comment
ICE Memo on Prosecutorial Discretion Regarding Certain Victims, Witnesses, and Plaintiffs
ICE 6/17/11 memo from Director John Morton setting policy on the exercise of prosecutorial discretion in removal cases involving victims and witnesses of crime, including domestic violence, and individuals involved in non-frivolous efforts related to civil rights protection.
Posted in Prosecutorial discretion
Leave a comment
OCAHO Says Reporting Unauthorized Workers Is Not Protected Under INA §274B
The Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO) found that there is no cause of action under INA §274B(a)(5), where the employee alleges retaliation for reporting the presence of undocumented workers or other violations that fall under INA §274A. … Continue reading
BIA Finds Conviction for Violating Kansas No-Contact Provision Is a Removable Offense
A conviction for violation of the no-contact provision of a protection order issued under the Kansas Protection from Abuse Act constitutes a removable offense under INA §237(a)(2)(E)(ii). Matter of Strydom, 25 I&N Dec. 507 (BIA 2011). The Board held that a … Continue reading
BIA Says Arriving Aliens Subject to Expedited Removal May Be Placed in §240 Proceedings
DHS has the discretion to place arriving aliens in removal proceedings under INA §240, even if they may also be subject to expedited removal under INA §235(b)(1)(A)(i). Matter of E-R-M- & L-R-M, 25 I&N Dec. 520 (BIA 2011)
Posted in BIA, Board of Immigration Appeals
Leave a comment