Courts have stated that immigration enforcement obligations do not consist only of initiating and conducting prompt proceedings that lead to removals at any cost. Rather, as has been said, the government wins when justice is done. In that regard, e.g. the handbook for trial attorneys states that “the respondent should be aided in obtaining any procedural rights or benefits required by the statute, regulation and controlling court decision, of the requirements of fairness.” Handbook for Trial Attorneys § 1.3 (1964). See generally Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas Co. v. FERC, 962 F.2d 45, 48 (D.C. Cir. 1992) (finding astonishing that counsel for a federal administrative agency denied that the A.B.A. Code of Professional Responsibility holds government lawyers to a higher standard and has obligations that “might sometimes trump the desire to pound an opponent into submission”); see also Reid v. INS, 949 F.2d 287 (9th Cir. 1991) (noting that government counsel has an interest only in the law being observed, not in victory or defeat).
Phone: 312-714-2800
-
Recent Posts
- Matter of O-Y-A-E- (BIA 2025): BIA Clarifies Convention Against Torture Standard—Old Threats Alone Are Not Enough August 23, 2025
- Soft Secession vs. Soft Fascism: How States Quietly Resist Federal Overreach August 22, 2025
- Cancellation of Removal: Understanding Deportation Relief for Non-Permanent Residents August 21, 2025
- With Chevron Gone: Timeline of Mandatory Detention and Rising Judicial Review in U.S. Immigration August 19, 2025
- Matter of G-C-I-: The BIA Just Rewrote the Rules for Credibility and Corroboration August 19, 2025
Archives
Categories
RSS Feed
Links
- CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD)
- Law Offices of Michael D. Baker
-
I like this weblog very much so much good info.