Phone: 312-714-2800
-
Recent Posts
- One Judge, One Hundred Respondents, One Morning: Inside DOJ’s “Mega Master” Hearings July 9, 2026
- The Referee Problem — Preview July 3, 2026
- Trump v. Slaughter: The Court Uncaged the Presidency. Everyone watched birthright citizenship. The Court’s real blast came the day before — and it rewired the executive branch. July 1, 2026
- A Charge Is Enough: Blanche v. Lau and the Green-Card Holder’s New Limbo. Proof Can Wait. Your Status Can’t June 23, 2026
- Matter of A-C-M- and Removal to Ecuador on the Papers: Summary Judgment Comes to Immigration Court June 17, 2026
Archives
Categories
RSS FeedLinks
- CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD)
- Law Offices of Michael D. Baker
-
Tag Archives: pro se respondents
Matter of A-C-M- and Removal to Ecuador on the Papers: Summary Judgment Comes to Immigration Court
How a three-decision trilogy and the U.S.–Ecuador Asylum Cooperative Agreement let the government deport a pro se Venezuelan to a country the State Department tells Americans not to enter — by asking the wrong legal question. Maracaibo, Venezuela → Guayaquil, … Continue reading
Posted in BIA & Federal Appeals
Tagged 8 CFR 1240.11, Asylum Cooperative Agreement, BIA, Celotex, Convention Against Torture, due process, Ecuador, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, INA 208(a)(2)(A), Lewis v. Faulkner, Matter of A-C-M-, Matter of C-I-G-M-, Matter of H-A-A-V-, mega master calendar, motion to pretermit, petition for review, pretermission, pro se respondents, safe third country, Seventh Circuit, summary judgment, Timms v. Frank, U.T. v. Bondi, Venezuela, withholding of removal
Leave a comment
