Phone: 312-714-2800
September 2026 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 -
Recent Posts
- Matter of Diji: The Board Killed a 25-Year Notice Rule It Didn’t Need To September 4, 2026
- Protected From Deportation, Deported Anyway August 29, 2026
- USCIS Can Now Send Asylum Seekers to Immigration Court Without an Interview August 22, 2026
- The Public Charge Net Widens on September 18, 2026 August 19, 2026
- The Board Cuts the Right to Counsel Down to Ten Days August 15, 2026
Archives
Categories
RSS FeedLinks
- CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD) CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 25-M-397(SCD)
- Law Offices of Michael D. Baker
-
Tag Archives: due process
The Board Cuts the Right to Counsel Down to Ten Days
In Matter of A-K-R-, the BIA holds that a single ten-day cushion is the only hard time the statute owes you to find a lawyer. Everything after it is a favor. By Michael D. Baker A detained man from India … Continue reading
One Judge, One Hundred Respondents, One Morning: Inside DOJ’s “Mega Master” Hearings
🏛️ Immigration Court Watch One Judge, One Hundred Respondents, One Morning The Justice Department crams more than a hundred people into a single “mega master” hearing, drags dockets forward by years, and banks on the ones without lawyers to trip. … Continue reading
Matter of A-C-M- and Removal to Ecuador on the Papers: Summary Judgment Comes to Immigration Court
How a three-decision trilogy and the U.S.–Ecuador Asylum Cooperative Agreement let the government deport a pro se Venezuelan to a country the State Department tells Americans not to enter — by asking the wrong legal question. Maracaibo, Venezuela → Guayaquil, … Continue reading
Posted in BIA & Federal Appeals
Tagged 8 CFR 1240.11, Asylum Cooperative Agreement, BIA, Celotex, Convention Against Torture, due process, Ecuador, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, INA 208(a)(2)(A), Lewis v. Faulkner, Matter of A-C-M-, Matter of C-I-G-M-, Matter of H-A-A-V-, mega master calendar, motion to pretermit, petition for review, pretermission, pro se respondents, safe third country, Seventh Circuit, summary judgment, Timms v. Frank, U.T. v. Bondi, Venezuela, withholding of removal
Leave a comment

USCIS Can Now Send Asylum Seekers to Immigration Court Without an Interview
No Interview, No Hearing, No One Watching By Michael D. Baker Immigration Equality v. Mullin, No. 1:26-cv-02921 (D.D.C. filed Aug. 19, 2026). It challenges Affirmative Asylum Referrals Without Interview, 91 Fed. Reg. 47101 (July 28, 2026). On July 28, the … Continue reading →