Category Archives: bond hearings required. Direct split with the 5th & 8th. SCOTUS cert is coming. Full analysis: mikebakerlaw.com/blog/cunha-v-freden-second-circuit-ewi-bond-hearings-1226 ⚖️Sonnet 4.6Adaptive

Second Circuit: Long-Term EWI Residents Are Not “Seeking Admission” — Bond Hearings Required | Cunha v. Freden

Update — October 1, 2026 The Supreme Court granted certiorari today in Rhoney v. Barbosa da Cunha, No. 26-104, to resolve whether 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A) mandates detention of noncitizens present in the United States without having been admitted. Arguments … Continue reading →

Posted in bond hearings, bond hearings required. Direct split with the 5th & 8th. SCOTUS cert is coming. Full analysis: mikebakerlaw.com/blog/cunha-v-freden-second-circuit-ewi-bond-hearings-1226 ⚖️Sonnet 4.6Adaptive, Buenrostro-Mendez, circuit split, Cunha v. Freden, immigration detention, Jennings v. Rodriguez, Laken Riley Act, Loper Bright, Second Circuit, Yajure Hurtado, Zadvydas, § 1225(b)(2)(A), § 1226(a) | Leave a comment